The answer would be Latin America
Because Approximately half of immigrants living in the United States are from Mexico or other Latin American countries. Many Central Americans are fleeing because of desperate social and economic circumstances created in part by U.S. foreign policy in Central America over many decades.
B Anthropologists believe that the earliest settlers migrated from Asia thousands of years ago
Explanation:
- The first American inhabitants, Paleo-Indians, arrived in the New World with a single, unique wave of migration from Siberia 23,000 years ago, to be divided into today's groups only later, DNA research showed.
- Most scientists agree that the continent was inhabited by people crossing the Bering Land Bridge (at that time there was a crossroads between Siberia and Alaska), and archaeological discoveries so far indicate that humans were present on American soil 15,000 years ago.
- These migrants split into two major groups about 13,000 years ago, at a time when glaciers were melting and roads inland were opening up in North America, experts say.
Answer:
It transitioned the economy of Texas from agricultural to industrial, because before, there were cattle ranges and mostly focused on the cotton and cattle industries. They would herd the cattle up to Kansas where cows would be shipped off to the East.
The cattle and cotton industry was very profitable most of the time, which led to them being the main attraction.
There were some people who thought, "Hey! Imma just start drilling for oil in some place that I just bought because why not!"
Then they hit oil and created a massive influx of profit, which led to other people thinking, "Hey! Deez people made a lotta dolla bills yall so Imma copy them!"
Finally, people started drilling for oil all over the place (even in their backyards) and transitioned the economy to oil and coal mining.
Even during WW2, miners were drilling for oil to power their fighting machines.
Explanation:
The documents C and B may indeed be related to one another. So many invasions occurred. Another connection is that the soldiers abandoned their defense, which meant that they would not be able to repel the invaders.
- There is a correlation because losing protection would make it harder for the soldiers to defeat the invaders if there were several invasions.
- It's conceivable that Documents C and B are related because Document B claimed that because the soldiers were helpless and surrendered, fled and rendered their army hopeless, the adversaries would seize control and a populace invasion would fill the void. As a result, Document B serves as both a justification for Rome's demise and evidence in Document C, which also depicts the invasion.
- The two documents are related to one another. They are related since they both involve the military. The reasons why the military disintegrated are discussed in document B. The invasion of Rome by the six tribes is discussed in document C. If the army hadn't disintegrated, the tribes wouldn't have been able to attack.
- This is due to the fact that documents B and C describe Rome's decline as a result of the invaders. It is explained in document B how the troops weakened themselves, and it is shown in document C together with a map of the empires that invaded Rome. My proof is found in B, where it states, "But when, due to carelessness and sloth, round drills were abandoned. This proof demonstrates the soldiers' slackness. Rome's invasions are depicted in C with lines, names, and dates. This proof provided me with the solution.
- Given that they both compare how Rome's army declined, Document C and Document B may be related to one another. I discovered this information by looking through Doc B's search results and then observing how many different nations had attacked Doc C. When these sources discuss how many different nations Rome's soldiers faced without armor, they are compared.
To learn more about document C and document B visit:brainly.com/question/27215505
#SPJ9
It resulted in the deaths of 1.5 to 2 million people from 1975 to 1979, nearly a quarter of Cambodia's 1975 population ( c. 7.8 million).
