Not sure if this will help but here's what I put:
They developed lots of new techniques for buildings and constructions. They also brought about incredibly well put together aqueducts that ran for miles. They built military roads and they are still a basis for many things that we build today.
They talked about equality under the law, and also came up with The Twelve Tables, which are very well known today. Christianity was banned in ancient Rome and Christians were punished for a very long time because of this. They were even fed to lions as entertainment.
People need to believe they have equal social and political rights, else there would be mass protests, revolutions and anarchy. Whether they actually exist in real life is irrelevant here, only the belief matters.
The primary difference in the social structures of humans and animals is the forced imposition of order in human society, leading to a more 'collective' society, instead of the usual 'survival of the fittest/law of the jungle' structure.
And the concept of equal rights is necessary to achieve this imposition of order.
In my opinion, a human society following 'law of the jungle' would be unsustainable, simply because humans as a species are too weak to survive as individuals. The greatest strength of our species is our mental faculty. This leads to the sum of the parts being greater than the whole. As individuals though, we would fail to harness this strength.
Therefore, equal rights do offer us an evolutionary advantage, since they allow us to cluster together, and grow as a population, which is the only way for us to survive.
The policy about the continuation of slavery does Lincoln supported was the policy of its founders to prohibit the spread of slavery into New Territories of USA because he had no doubt that the slavery will become extinct.
According to the fragment of Abraham Lincoln's speech, it can be affirmed that he was in favor of slavery in a restricted way in the territories where they already existed without allowing its expansion to the new territories, saying:
<em>"ALL I HAVE REQUESTED OR WANTED ANYWHERE IS TO BE REPLACED ON THE BASIS ON WHICH THE PARENTS OF OUR GOVERNMENT ORIGINALLY PLACED IT"</em>
On the other hand, he agreed with this proposal because he did not have doubt that it would be the way to radicate slavery by limiting it to those territories where already existed, because it was going to gradually fade, saying
<em>"I have no doubt that it would be extinguished, forever, if we went back to adopting the parenting policy."</em>
Learn more in: brainly.com/question/20903815
Answer:
Explanation: Parts the main part of the Constitution is the liberty of the people of the United States of America the way it's broken up to is buy how the laws affect the people and their rights
