The west is known for their colonisation of many countries in Asia and other continents. However, not all these activities are with full acceptance. The reaction of the Asian to Western claims is in intensification of anti-imperial resistance activities and independence movements.
<h3>Asian reactions</h3>
Asian reactions to Western claims of racial and cultural superiority were strongly rooted in the practices of anti-imperialist resistance and independence movements, especially in relation to European cultures.
Therefore, in the quest of the Asia to end Western superiority, they reacted to Western claims inorder to intensify their interest.
learn more about Colonisation of Asia from here:
brainly.com/question/365379
Answer:
By 1880, the transcontinental railroad was transporting $50 million worth of freight each year. In addition to transporting western food crops and raw materials to East Coast markets and manufactured goods from East Coast cities to the West Coast, the railroad also facilitated international trade
Answer:
The Declaration of Independence is an important part of American democracy because first it contains the ideals or goals of our nation. Second it contains the complaints of the colonists against the British king. Third, it contains the arguments the colonists used to explain why they wanted to be free of British rule
The answer would be : ranchers' refusal to use technology. During the late 1880s, the technologies began to rapidly developed within the industry. But back then, a lot of ranchers are really comfortable in using traditional ways (using slaves) and they refuse to use technology
Answer:
In literary and historical analysis, presentism is the anachronistic introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past. Modern historians seek to avoid presentism in their work because they consider it a form of cultural bias, and believe it creates a distorted understanding of their subject matter.[1] The practice of presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past.
