Answer:
not knowing how to answer. Not understanding the topic and questions and needing help. ALSO STRESS!!!!
Answer:
The Stoics were Ancient Roman philosophers who claimed that the ideal state of mind was tranquility, which can not be achieved by pursuing enjoyable experiences, but by developing a calm indifference towards one's circumstances. This is a concept that opposes what Burkeman calls the modern-day cult of optimism, which forces us to try to find the good in bad situations. Burkeman explains there´s an alternative “negative path” to happiness, through the acceptance of the things that could go wrong.
Explanation:
I personally agree with this philosophy, as it´s very similar to the kind of strategy I found to deal with my anxiety. Instead of constantly worrying about what could go wrong, I trained myself to recognize which fears were a real possibility and changed my mindset to accept that not everything is under my control, and that is ok.
M. Bermutier's explanation is not satisfactory because it does not reach a credible conclusion.
Although you haven't shown it, this question is about the short story "The Hand."
By reading this story, we can see that:
- M. Bermutier is a judge who is trying to unravel the mysteries about a disembodied hand that is promoting crimes in the city.
- The problem is that no one knows who is to blame for these crimes.
- M. Bermutier, as a judge, begins to judge the cases through various pieces of evidence, but does not conclude who is the culprit, or even if this hand may be real.
- He claims that this is not a supernatural situation, although he knows it is difficult to explain.
- He continues to show evidence, but the culprit for the crimes and the explanation of the hand is never presented.
In this case, although his explanation shows that the crimes are not being supernaturally caused, he does not explain what the disembodied hand is or even if this hand may exist. For this reason, his explanation is not satisfactory.
More information:
brainly.com/question/18717414?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
Parallelism
Explanation:
Parallelism is a chain of identical syntactic functions or a chain of sentences of equal syntactic values. Prayers that present themselves with the same external syntactic structure, by connecting with each other in a process in which it is not allowed to establish greater relevance of one over the other, create a process of liaison by coordination. As it happens in the text above.
You can write a letter to Denzel Washington, for example, and ask him to be the chief guest at your school and talk about his experience playing Macbeth.
<h3>How to write a letter</h3>
Below you will find the steps and tips to write a letter to Denzel Washington inviting him to be the chief guest at your school's drama week:
- Start your letter by placing the date on the top right corner and then the salutation "Dear Mr. Washington" on the left side.
- Be straightforward but polite. Immediately explain why you are writing the letter: "I am writing to kindly invite you to..."
- In the second paragraph, explain why you admire that actor and why it would be such an honor to have him as a chief guest.
- In the third paragraph, tell him it would be most appreciated if he could talk about his experience playing Macbeth, since your school has been working on that play as well.
- End the letter by restating your wish. Say goodbye by writing "Best regards," or "Sincerely" and then signing your name.
Learn more about writing letters here:
brainly.com/question/24623157
#SPJ1