Answer:
I believe the answer is b. because The Know Nothing movement also briefly emerged as a major political party in the form of the American Party, and they were primarily an anti-Catholic, anti-immigration, and xenophobic movement, originally starting as a secret society. So they wouldn't be supported by Catholics if they were anti-Catholic, right?
Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
Answer is: <span>presidential plan was more lenient toward South.
</span>After election in 1866 congressional plan take control of Reconstruction policy.
<span>Congressional plan was harsher. Congressr emove former Confederates from power and enfranchise the freedmen. </span><span>Presidents </span>Abraham Lincoln<span> </span><span> took moderate positions toward South.</span>
Hi! :)
Answer: None spoke of social or economic conditions in the colonies.
I'm 100% sure, the answer is B. German invasion of Poland.
The Germans invaded Poland, and crossed Poland to Russia, where they broke the treaty with the Soviet Union.
Afterwards, the Soviet Union joined the Allies, and WWII began.
Hope this helps!:)
