Answer:
An experiment in which 36 people were fitted with a robotic third thumb has demonstrated the brain’s uncanny ability to adapt and leverage an entirely new body part, and in ways the researchers are still trying to understand.
The Third Thumb started as an award-winning graduate project at the Royal College of Art in London, England, and it was done to reframe the traditional view of prosthetics. “The project began as a way to better understand what it was like to control something extra attached to my body,” Dani Clode, designer of the Third Thumb, explained in an email. “As a prosthetic arm designer, I wanted to understand the unique relationship between a person and a prosthesis. It’s a relationship unlike any other product, and I wanted to explore that.”
Indeed, the Third Thumb represents an augmentation of the human body, as opposed to the replacement or restoration of “normal” human functionality. It’s a very transhumanist concept, but scientists don’t actually know if the human brain can meaningfully support an added body part or the long-term consequences of the extra cognitive load.
“These questions are complex and require the collaboration of experts from different fields,” Tamar Makin, professor of cognitive neuroscience at University College London and head of the Plasticity Lab, said in an email. “In our study, we used Dani’s cleverly designed Third Thumb to explore how the human brain can support an extra body part, and how the augmentative technology might impact our brain.”
The answers are important, as an additional thumb could lead to a host of benefits. It could help with repetitive, difficult, and physically demanding tasks, while also being of assistance to people who have either permanently or temporarily lost the use of one hand. It could also result in entirely new capabilities and activities, whether it be a new way of playing a musical instrument (or enabling the invention of a new type of musical instrument!) or the advent of an entirely new sporting activity.
It would make more sense if you did “later, she added a suggestion box.”
It's C. the narrator's insanity makes her an unreliable narrator and it's difficult to understand what's going on because we only get her perception--and obviously the perception of someone insane isn't easy to understand. B is simply incorrect, because first person POV doesn't tell you the thoughts of all characters, and D. is incorrect as well. in no way does it address the reader. in regards to A, we don't really connect with her because we don't understand what's happening throughout the story.
Hello. You did not provide the excerpt to which this question refers. Which makes it impossible for it to be answered accurately. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
To be able to understand Cal's point of view about himself, you have to read the text and recognize the tone that the text emits. The tone is the feeling that the text gives to the reader. If that tone conveys a positive feeling, it means that Cal's view of him is also positive. If the tone expresses a negative feeling, it means that the lime view on itself is reactive.
Main idea, and supporting details.
Hoped I helped.
