Answer:
A. S.1626 - Intellectual Property Bankruptcy Protection Act of 1987
B. This law specifically protects the licensor of a right of intellectual property and how this property must be handled in case of bankruptcy.
C. The header states what is the law purpose and the situations that it must be taken into account "Amends Federal bankruptcy provisions to provide that if the trustee in bankruptcy rejects an executory contract under which the debtor is a licensor of a right to intellectual property, the licensee may elect to:[...]". Finally it provides the definition for the intellectual property that it protects "(1) trade secrets; (2) inventions, processes, designs, or plants protected under applicable patent laws; (3) patent applications; (4) plant varieties; (5) works of authorship protected under applicable copyright laws; or (6) mask works (semiconductor chip components) protected under applicable copyright laws."
D. The text structure shows that it states the law purpose and then provides the specific cases and situations that it protects. The law defines Intellectual property at the end to state clearly what does it protects.
E. All definitions stated in the last paragraph define what does the law protects as intellectual property in case of bankruptcy. When the law defines some goods, it also excludes other ones. If there's something that is not included or doesn't belong to any of the six numerals, it couldn't be protected as intellectual property.
F. DeConcini, D. (1988, October 18). S.1626 - 100th Congress (1987-1988): Intellectual Property Bankruptcy Protection Act of 1987 [Webpage]. Retrieved October 9th 2019, from https://www.congress.gov/bill/100th-congress/senate-bill/1626 It's cited following APA 6th edition.
Explanation:
Horses, donkeys, mules, pigs, cattle, sheep, goats, chickens, large dogs, cats and bees were rapidly adopted by native peoples for transport, food, and other uses.
Answer: C) showed the US backed the independence of Latin America.
Explanation:
The United States was still young at the time the Monroe Doctrine was declared, and did not have a powerful navy to be patrolling the South American coast at that time. But the US did want to keep European powers from encroaching into the Western Hemisphere, and wanted to put Europe on notice to that effect.
President James Monroe asserted the doctrine in his annual address to Congress in 1823. The doctrine was that the US would not interfere in European affairs, but also would view any attempts by European powers to take control of any nation in the Western Hemisphere as a hostile act against the United States.
As reported by the US Office of the Historian, there were some additional motives in mind in the US position, in addition to backing the independence of Latin American nations. "Monroe’s administration forewarned the imperial European powers against interfering in the affairs of the newly independent Latin American states or potential United States territories. While Americans generally objected to European colonies in the New World, they also desired to increase United States influence and trading ties throughout the region to their south."
Answer:
I don't know
Explanation:
But you can ask that question to google
