<span>false cause
When a speaker or writer tries to connect two things that don't directly have an effect on each other as having an effect on each other, it is false cause. Saying that one thing directly causes another when there is no proof or factual evidence to back that up weakens an argument significantly. </span>
Answer:
An appeal based on the author’s character
Explanation:
searched it up
Wouldn’t it be mood? not forsure but i think so
Answer:Many people believe that the dog is man's best friend. Well a coyote is a little different and is not excactly a mans best friend unless he is a farmer. Coyotes can be very helpful to farmers because they scare or eat little rodents like rats or scares off rabbits who might eat your crops. Coyotes can be helpful in many ways.
Explanation:
This is just a summary about coyotes all you have to do is put some ways they can be a mans best friend Or how they can be usefull or bad things about them.
Answer:
Explanation:The correct answer is the last option - An implicit statement is something expressed indirectly.
The difference between implicit and explicit statements is in the way they are told to the listener/audience. When it comes to explicit statements, they are told directly, without you having to imply the meaning. The speaker/writer simply says that statement explicitly, without hiding the meaning.
On the other hand, an implicit statement is expressed indirectly. This means that you have to imply, or search for the exact meaning of the statement, rather than just to be told in simple terms what the speaker/writer intended.
\