Answer:
Acts 1 and 2 of the play and the first 35 minutes of the film both contain the same characters. The characters looked slightly different than I imagined they would. For example, I expected Eliza to look more untidy and shabby in the film. Alfred Doolittle looked very healthy and hearty for an ordinary dustman. I thought he would look skinny and worn-out to reflect his background. I also expected Colonel Pickering and Higgins to look about the same age. But in the film, Pickering looks a lot older than Higgins.
In the play, Higgins is supposed to be at least 20 years older than Eliza. However, in the film he doesn’t look very old compared to Eliza—they look about the same age. Plus, in the play, Higgins is first introduced as the Notetaker and brought to the audience’s attention when Eliza confronts him about observing her. In the film, the audience first sees him walking through the Covent Garden market before the main events of the play even begin.
Explanation:
this is what edumentum provides, so be careful!
Yes it is D all the way right answer
Answer:
<em>E </em><u><em>ambivalence</em></u>
Explanation:
Answer:
We were at a disadvantage <em><u>in</u></em><em> </em>that that we weren't too familiar with the language the others were using.
Explanation:
In the given sentence, the correct preposition to be used is "in". This is because "in" will introduce the argument or provide an explanation for the statement before the blank.
With the use of "in", the statement <em>"we weren't too familiar with the language the others were using"</em> provides an explanation for the first statement <em>"[W]e were at a disadvantage"</em>. Whereas the use of the prepositions "by", "with", and "for" are incorrect.
Thus, the correct answer is "in".
Answer:
c a statistic that supports a claim-apex :)
Explanation: