Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
Yes, going by the question above, the protocol validates Bob to Alice for the reason that the key is only shared between Bob and Alice as well as the number which is being sent randomly. Therefore the invader won’t be able to predict and response to that number. Because of the authentication protocol, that makes use of a classical cryptosystem thereby resulting into the possibility of an argument such that key finding is attainable via invader.
Hello! The slide transition helps with the transitions of slides and the animation helps out with the words appearing on the screen in a more creative way. Therefore, C and D are out. The slide layout is the part where if you click on it, slide designs are shown for you to choose from. The shapes can be used for design, but it doesn't help if you're looking for the design of a slide. The answer is A: slide layout.
Answer:
Null
Explanation:
It entirely depends on the language you are using to implement this.
But generally by the rule of scope, "result" will return null since get() was not defined to accept any argument, and it neither know the global "x" not defined it's own x in the function.
Yes , it’s true. In a known-plaintext attack (kpa), the cryptanalyst can only view a small portion of encrypted data, and he or she has no control over what that data might be.
The attacker also has access to one or more pairs of plaintext/ciphertext in a Known Plaintext Attack (KPA). Specifically, consider the scenario where key and plaintext were used to derive the ciphertext (either of which the attacker is trying to find). The attacker is also aware of what are the locations of the output from key encrypting. That is, the assailant is aware of a pair. They might be familiar with further pairings (obtained with the same key).
A straightforward illustration would be if the unencrypted messages had a set expiration date after which they would become publicly available. such as the location of a planned public event. The coordinates are encrypted and kept secret prior to the event. But when the incident occurs, the attacker has discovered the value of the coordinates /plaintext while the coordinates were decrypted (without knowing the key).
In general, a cipher is easier to break the more plaintext/ciphertext pairs that are known.
To learn more about Plaintext Attack click here:
brainly.com/question/28445346
#SPJ4
