It's definitely not in a theocracy: those usually favour the majorities.
Also migrant labors don't specifically favour minorities.
Now, between democracies and command economies the choice is very hard, as it depends more on the specific country. So for example in many places the role of the minorities rose in command economies, since they went against the patriarchy (in China this was the case for example, the role of women in China improved drastically, while women and minorities are still struggling in Japan, which is a democracy). On the other hand, Nazi Germany was also a command economy, and yet it was very bad for minorities
I would say that the question is too complex to give just one answer, but I would also argue for option d)
Answer:
The federal courts are likely to declare the law constitutional because Milton's actions substantially affect interstate commerce.
Explanation:
Being a citizen is also knowing our rights and fulfilling our duties. For that, the laws can help a lot! They are the rules of the game and exist to ensure that democracy and the rights of all are respected. In this regard, the law shown in the above question was created to protect Milton State's local trade and allow all traders to have the same opportunities, so even if Milton provides arguments to prove that the law is unconstitutional. , the constitution ensures the creation of local trade laws. For this reason, federal courts are likely to declare constitutional law because Milton's actions substantially affect interstate commerce.
