During the election of 1936, declaring their party a "millionaire's union," Franklin Roosevelt focused mainly on defeating the "<span>d. Liberty League running Father Coughlin"</span>
Depends on your view, this is an opinion-based question, so there is no right or wrong answer.
Here is my opinion: I think that the U.S should have declared war to Mexico. First, I believe that Texas was a territory that belonged to the U.S, as Mexican General Antonio Lopez signed a treaty that gave the U.S the right to annex Texas. Furthermore, most people that lived in Texas wanted to be part of the United States. Like democracy given to those in the Kansas-Nebraska territory years later, to decide whether they should be a free state or a slave state, the people should decide what they want to do with their state.
Second, I hold the view that the war is rational because expansionism is done in peaceful ways, but Mexico refused to be peaceful and immediately resorted to war. President James Polk wanted to expand the U.S, but Mexico refused to give up Texas. Today, we have Texas as a result of this war.
He easily won reelection because of the person he was running against. He also won because before he had created the new deal, which brought a lot of people jobs. People wanted him to stay because of his programs.
Hope this helps!:)
Reductionism-the practice of analyzing and describing a complex phenomenon in terms of phenomena that are held to represent a simpler or more fundamental level, especially when this is said to provide a sufficient explanation.
Because they feared the abuse of power that they had experienced when they were subjects of the king and the royal governors. American trust that the legislature was the most popular branch of government. The people elected representatives. A power legislature was the initial thought to be the finest way to avert abuse of the power in another monarchy or dictatorship because the power was common.
