Answer:
These amendments were intended to guarantee freedom to former slaves and to establish and prevent discrimination in certain civil rights to former slaves and all citizens of the United States. The promise of these amendments was eroded by state laws and federal court decisions throughout the late 19th century.
Explanation:
The answer is the HAUC which is short for <span>The House Un-American Activities Committee.</span>
Answer:
The Schenck v. United States trial - case-law on the possibility of limiting fundamental freedoms in wartime, 1919
Explanation:
In the Supreme Court’s decision, written by Judge Oliver Holmes, the Doctrine of Clear and Present Danger Rule was first articulated, according to which the US Congress has the right to restrict freedom of speech in cases where, in its opinion, citizens' statements constitute a “clearly existing danger” and may lead to serious negative consequences. The decision also indicated that restrictions on freedom of speech may be introduced during times of war and emergency, and this does not violate the First Amendment to the US Constitution. The court upheld the lower court’s verdict for inciting rebellion to Socialist Party activist Charles T. Schenck, who distributed materials calling for resistance to military service.
The correct answer is becasue The Irish were Catholics
Long before they arrived, the poor,hunger stricken Irish met a protestant society which still scorned the excesses of papal control. The Irish threatened to take low paying jobs,and were believed to be carrying diseases, but the scorn they received was largely because of their catholic affiliations. Protestant feared the pope would follow up the catholic Irish with a large army to overthrow the USA government.
