Not necessarily. it's considered <span>audacious, yes. not so nice to listen to. it had a purpose and was effective in fulfilling that purpose; it was definitely influential.
but nonetheless, from an aesthetic standpoint you could definitely argue that it's defective.</span>
The 1st painting is called japanese bamboo painting. The 2nd is called Degas Portraits à La Bourse. They are both one brush single stroked paintings. But the 1st is ink and the 2nd is oil.... SOOOO I hope this gives you and understanding.....
The description column should be filled with the questions "what is the name of the artist?" and "what is the name of the artwork?"
Based on that, we can fill in the other columns as follows:
- Analyze: "Are the shapes small, large geometric, or free form?" and "Is the use of space naturalistic, compact, or random?"
- Interpretation: "What is the artist trying to convey?" and "Is the work a representation of the real world or something abstract?"
- Judgment: "Is the artwork worth displaying in an art gallery?" and "Has the artist done justice to the artwork?"
<h3>How are these phases of criticism important?</h3>
The description allows the identification of the work of art and its artists, which can generate a lot of information for the reader. Meanwhile, the analysis allows for the knowledge of the artist's technique and how it makes the artwork efficient.
In addition, the interpretation allows people to understand the message of the work and what the artist intends to convey. Finally, the judgment allows the public to value the work and draw conclusions about its relevance.
Learn more about art criticism:
brainly.com/question/17413723
#SPJ1
rn, I have the flavour of noodles that I ate a hour ago, but I don't remember anything coz I have a lot of assignments that I have to submit by 3 January ಠ﹏ಠ
it's too boring
(〒﹏〒)
False, Dark Rooms have plenty of hazards and need a trained individual to use them correctly and safely.
