Answer:
I think a business writer has to check the date a source was publish to see is the information is up-to-date or to see if the source is a primary or secondary source.
Social media is a virtual platform that helps people to connect with each other. Reports state that shy teens are more likely to connect on social platforms and feel more outgoing.
<h3 /><h3>How Social media helps shy teens?</h3>
Approximately 25% of teens have reported that social media makes them feel less shy. Social media helps teens to connect on online platforms, which boosts the confidence in teens as they do not have to face people in person.
Social media provides a platform to teens is a general statement and does not imply any evidence that social media helps teens who are shy to interact or connect with others.
Therefore, option 'B', social media gives them a place to make friends, is not sufficient to provide the relevant evidence to support the claim.
Learn more about social media, here,
brainly.com/question/25963465
Answer:
Explanation:
Any language you use to describe Jefferson's phrasing of the declaration must not be chosen.
The Declaration was written at get peril to those writing and signing it. They could have been hanged for treason at any time.
So you should eliminate answers that contain difficult, fanciful and sophisticated.
Difficult: get a dictionary. Look them up. Use them when the occasion is right.
Sophisticated: The Declaration was a legal document. It uses words that reflect the seriousness of George's answers. George must be made to understand that his actions have consequences.
Fanciful: I won't even bother to give a reason for not using this word.
Every American should be familiar with the Declaration. It should not be degraded by saying that the language is inappropriate. Many deaths when the war for independence began paid in blood for the warning those words presented.
The answer is the second one from the top.
The answer is the 2nd one or i dont know m just trying to level up
Answer:
In the given excerpt he is saying that the differences between the kings and the subjects are not natural or necessary. He does not claim that there will always be a need to separate kings and their subjects.
Explanation: