Answer: e. c and d
Explanation:
Smith engaging in riskier actions or investments will mean that Smith has a higher probability of earning either a higher or lower income.
When investing in a risky investment, there will be a higher return attached to it. This is why Corporate bonds yield more than Treasury bonds. The higher risk is to compensate the investor (in this case Smith) for engaging in riskier behavior. If the investment is successful, the return will be paid meaning Smith gets a higher income than Jones who did not take the risk.
When investing in a risky investment, one must still remember that there is a reason the investment is considered risky. There is a higher chance that it will not pay out. Therefore, should Smith engage in more risk and it does not work out, Smith will earn a lower income than Jones who did not invest in the risky investment.
<span>In the Elstad case the court ruled that
the suspect’s statement that put him in the act, or admitted guilt was unsolicited. He was taken to the station and Maranda
before he gave a second statement.
During the questioning of Seibert, five days after the act, the officer
questioned her for 30 to 40 minutes obtaining a confession that caused a death
in the fire of her trailer. After taking
a 20 minute break the officer came back, read the Maranda and obtained a signed
waiver. Then got another statement. The
District Court suppressed the prewarning statement but admitted the post
warning one, and Seibert was convicted of second-degree murder. The Missouri
Court of Appeals affirmed, finding the case indistinguishable from Oregon
v. Elstad,
in which this Court held that a suspect's
unwarned inculpatory statement made during a brief exchange at his house did
not make a later, fully warned inculpatory statement inadmissible. In
reversing, the State Supreme Court held that, because the interrogation was
nearly continuous, the second statement, which was clearly the product of the
invalid first statement, should be suppressed; and distinguished Elstad
on the ground that the warnings had not intentionally been withheld</span>
Answer:
THE REAL-WORLD CONTEXT OF POPULATION GROWTH, BIODIVERSITY LOSSES, CUMULATIVE POLLUTION, WEALTH DISPARITIES AND SOCIAL INEQUITIES - CLOSES OFF FUTURE OPTIONS. TO REVERSE DIRECTION, DEVELOPMENT MUST, AMONG OTHER SUSTAINABILITY CRITERIA, INCREASE NATURE BEYOND PRE-HUMAN CONDITIONS.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
HTML is an acronym for hypertext markup language and it is a standard programming language which is used for designing, developing and creating web pages.
Generally, all HTML documents are divided into two (2) main parts; body and head. The head contains information such as version of HTML, title of a page, metadata, link to custom favicons and CSS etc. The body of the HTML document contains the contents or informations of a web page to be displayed.
Website refers to the collective name used to describe series of web pages linked together with the same domain name while a webpage is the individual HTML document (single page) that makes up a website with a unique uniform resource locator (URL).
Hence, a website and webpage are totally different from each other.