Ranger says the expression is not in its simplest form. He thinks the two terms need to be combined. Is Ranger right that 8x − 2
0 can be simplified further? Provide support for your response.
2 answers:
Answer:
4(2x - 5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Rewrite "20" as 4 * 5
Rewrite "8" as 4 * 2
=4 * 2x - 4 * 5
Factor out common term "4"
=4(2x - 5) <------ Your answer.
Answer: Ranger is correct, because the expression is in simple form an it has no parenthesis or like terms.
Step-by-step explanation:
You might be interested in
Answer:
720
Step-by-step explanation:
6 x 120=720
Every 1 cm=120 km
So multiply both sides by 6 and you get
6 cm= 720 km
Answer:
15:20
15/20
15 to 20
there are 3 types of ways and there you go.
Step-by-step explanation:
have a great day ! :)
9514 1404 393
Answer:
h ≤ 6 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
The inequality is presumed to be ...
15h +40 ≤ 140
15h ≤ 100
h ≤ 6 2/3
__
The graph shows h ≥ 0, because the inequality is only reasonable for h ≥ 0.
Um well its quite common when going to the store and something is 50% off
It is just 18 :)It is just 18 :)
