Ranger says the expression is not in its simplest form. He thinks the two terms need to be combined. Is Ranger right that 8x − 2 0 can be simplified further? Provide support for your response.
2 answers:
Answer:
4(2x - 5)
Step-by-step explanation:
Rewrite "20" as 4 * 5
Rewrite "8" as 4 * 2
=4 * 2x - 4 * 5
Factor out common term "4"
=4(2x - 5) <------ Your answer.
Answer: Ranger is correct, because the expression is in simple form an it has no parenthesis or like terms.
Step-by-step explanation:
You might be interested in
Answer:
I think is C like I said not quite sure...
Answer:
x=5 is what i got from a calculaotr
Step-by-step explanation:
Hello! Thanks for letting me answer your question! If you have any more questions feel free to ask me! If not, Have a WONDERFUL day and Please don't forget to consider making me Brainliest on your question today!
I need to know the sides of the trapezoid in order to find the perimeter
Answer:
20
Step-by-step explanation:
cause when you do 3=4 equals 4 then multiply 5 then you have 20
Answer:
