The policies of the winning and losing powers in Europe and the Us were resultant in the second world war.
Explanation:
After the first world war there was an undercurrent of dictatorship and fascism in many countries that was on the rise but the winners of the war did not much care for it.
They were taking up a policy of suspension and of appeasement to quell the desire of the Germans and the Italians but that was not to happen as diplomacy failed.
The harsh treaty of Versailles had made it hard for the losing sides not to harbor resentment and it burst open in another animosity and war
Answer:
Persians.
Explanation:
They settled during that time.
The answer really depends on whether the farmer is also the landlord or only a worker in the fields, and bearing in mind that the question refers only to Chavez’ reforms, not what is now called Chavismo, that is to say, the rule of President Maduro.
If the first, then there are chances that the landlord would feel threatened about the fact this his land could be —although not necessarily— appropriated by the State, but also, he might feel relieved to learn that his land could be more productive since there would be a lot more subsidies for farming since the oil revenues of the country would again be in the hands of the State.
If it is the second possibility, the farmer most likely would feel relieved altogether since subsidies to labor power and farming would mean greater income and better living conditions for him and his family.
Answer:
I believe the answer is B.
Explanation:
I appologize if I'm incorrect xD
Thomas Gage, also known as General Gage was responsible for sending those troops for ammunition.
~I hope this helped!
I am, yours most sincerely,
Joshua A. Bunn
