1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
artcher [175]
2 years ago
10

I don't like Indian guys. They thirsty as heII

English
1 answer:
ANEK [815]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:  Have A Nice Day/Night :)

Explanation:

Please Keep Non-School Related Topics Off of BRAINLY

You might be interested in
Justify Gopal's action of changing his appearance by quoting instances from the lesson to authenticate your answer? Hurry plz. G
BlackZzzverrR [31]

Answer:

Gopal's action of changing his appearance is a good decision because he succeeded in bringing the Hilsa fish to the palace without anyone asking him about it because they were all focused on his appearance.

Explanation:

In order to take up the challenge given by the king, Gopal shaved his face, smeared himself with ash and wore torn cloths. this attracted the attention of the people to his  appearance and nobody talked about the hilsa fish bought by him.

furthermore, on reaching the palace, the guards stopped him from entering, then Gopals starts singing in a loud voice and dancing too. This made the king to allow the stranger come in. even inside  the palace, no one asks about the hilsa fish including the king instead he asked about Gopal's dressing. then Gopal reminded the king of the challenge, which the king congratulates him on winning the challenge. The challenge by the king is that; The king told Gopal to buy a hilsa fish and bring it to the palace and that nobody should ask him a word about it.

Therefore, Gopal's action of changing his appearance is justified because he managed to draw people's attention to his appearance and away from the hilsa fish.

7 0
2 years ago
How does the structure of this Italian sonnet by Petrarch support its theme?
Snowcat [4.5K]

How does the structure of this Italian sonnet by Petrarch support its theme?  An octave builds an idea about love, while the sestet comments on that idea

<h3>Explanation: </h3>

Francesco Petrarca is the best known for the Iyric poetry of his Canzoniere and is considered as one of the greatest love poets of world literature.

<em> Those eyes, 'neath which my passionate rapture rose, </em>

<em>The arms, hands, feet, the beauty that erewhile </em>

<em>Could my own soul from its own self beguile, </em>

<em>And in a separate world of dreams enclose, </em>

<em>The hair's bright tresses, full of golden glows, </em>

<em>And the soft lightning of the angelic smile </em>

<em>That changed this earth to some celestial isle, </em>

<em>Are now but dust, poor dust, that nothing knows. </em>

<em>And yet I live! Myself I grieve and scorn, </em>

<em>Left dark without the light I loved in vain, </em>

<em>Adrift in tempest on a bark forlorn; </em>

<em>Dead is the source of all my amorous strain, </em>

<em>Dry is the channel of my thoughts outworn, </em>

<em>And my sad harp can sound but notes of pain.</em>

The structure of this Italian sonnet by Petrarch support its theme that an octave builds an idea about love, while the sestet comments on that idea. The Petrarch sonnet has an octave and a sestet. The octave usually deal with an idea of love, whereas in the sestet the writer would talk analyze that idea.

Learn more about   Francesco Petrarca brainly.com/question/8254030

#LearnWithBrainly

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You'd better mark that package _______________ so the movers know not to be too rough with it.
alex41 [277]
Answer:
“Fragile”

Explanation:
Common sense
3 0
2 years ago
Altavista and google are examples of
anzhelika [568]
Web-Based email service's
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What's a Double Negative in this sentence<br><br> Sidney couldn't do nothing with her hair.
Andreyy89

Answer:

Explanation:

"I didn't do nothing" as a double negative gives the meaning of a weakened affirmative in standard English. It is equivalent to “I did something”. "I didn't do nothing" may retain its negative meaning when it is sometimes used in non-standard or informal English

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which sentence is an example of faulty parallelism?
    5·1 answer
  • One disadvantage of telling language is that if telling is used too much, the story can bog down in unnecessary detail.
    15·2 answers
  • Everybody _______ excited today because both a lawyer and a doctor_______ here.
    7·1 answer
  • Which words support the idea that the excerpt is an opinion?
    9·2 answers
  • The genre of writing that is often referred to as a rich mix of different ideas, techniques, and methods is called?
    12·2 answers
  • What are two things that show what protesters or government are doing to help the Black Lives
    7·1 answer
  • In the Devil and Tom Walker (p. 349). Where does Old Scratch mark the names of the people he makes deals with?
    12·1 answer
  • State whether you agree or disagree and fi nd evidence from the text to support your opinion.
    7·1 answer
  • Coherence in Your Interpretive Essay: Mastery Test Select the correct answer, You are writing an assay about how a character's a
    10·1 answer
  • Making Inferences from Implicit Details
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!