1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilya [14]
4 years ago
15

Compare and contrast the strong mayor-council and weak mayor-council styles of city government.

History
2 answers:
velikii [3]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The answer above me is the right answer for this question. :)

Explanation:

Rom4ik [11]4 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

Under the Strong mayor-council style of city government, the mayor is the main chief executive of the town or city with executive authority or power to veto the council decision

On the other hand, a Weak mayor-council style of city government is just a council chairman with ceremonial and parliamentary powers only.

You might be interested in
Why do you think that states dropped voting requirements for white men in the Early Republic? Why did those same states add new
makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Explanation:

The rise of political parties as the fundamental organizing unit of the Second (Two) Party System represented a sharp break from the values that had shaped Republican and Federalist political competition. Leaders in the earlier system remained deeply suspicious that parties could corrupt and destroy the young republic. At the heart of the new legitimacy of parties, and their forthright celebration of democracy, was the dramatic expansion of VOTING RIGHTS for white men.

Hope this helps

3 0
3 years ago
He mountain chain in west central russia that is often regarded as the boundary between europe and asia is called the
LiRa [457]
The Urals are often referred  to as the split between Europe and Asia <span />
5 0
4 years ago
How was General Andrew Jackson’s victory in New Orleans different from other battles in the War of 1812?
shutvik [7]
A or c ........................
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The leaders of the US, USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yalta and Potsdam
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:  Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests.   So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them.   As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime."  Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion.  Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR.  That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death.  Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism.  Again as noted by The Churchill Project:  "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire."  As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Similarities between Sumer trade economics and China trade economics
Margarita [4]

Explanation:

sjdhdhdudgdudghdhdbdbdhdhdbdbbdbdhdbdbdjdndbdbdndhbdjdbdhdbdhdndjdbdhbdudbdjdbdjbdudhdjdjdjdhdhdhhdhdhdgdhdhdihdudhdjdjdudhhdhdhdbdhdgdjddvdhdbdjdbjdbdjdbjdjdjdhdhhdhdhdjdhdhdjhdhdhdudhdidhudhdurbduhdjdhdbdbdb

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • French settlers came to America for all the following reasons except:
    8·1 answer
  • History question down below
    5·2 answers
  • The two party system in American history
    7·2 answers
  • Why did members of the working poor oppose the Emancipation of slaves?​
    5·1 answer
  • Under the Constitution, the principle of "federalism" is the main reason that power and responsibility are...
    9·1 answer
  • With what strategy did grant plan to defeat the confederacy?
    14·1 answer
  • Ancient middle east and egypt unit test
    12·1 answer
  • "which of these was the most conservative force in the ottoman empire in the early 1800s?"
    9·1 answer
  • What was added to the Constitution that listed rights not already in the Constitution?
    11·1 answer
  • Who began loaning explorers money during the 1600s?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!