Because the framers of the United States Constitution (written in 1787) believed that protecting property rights relating to inventions would encourage the new nation’s economic growth, they gave Congress—the national legislature—a constitutional mandate to grant patents for inventions. The resulting patent system has served as a model for those in other nations. Recently, however, scholars have questioned whether the American system helped achieve the framers’ goals. These scholars have contended that from 1794 to roughly 1830, American inventors were unable to enforce property rights because judges were “anticipate” and routinely invalidated patents for arbitrary reasons. This argument is based partly on examination of court decisions in cases where patent holders (“patentees”) brought suit alleging infringement of their patent rights. In the 1820s, for instance, 75 percent of verdicts were decided against the patentee. The proportion of verdicts for the patentee began to increase in the 1830s, suggesting to these scholars that judicial attitudes toward patent rights began shifting then.
To learn more about protecting property rights visit here ; brainly.com/question/28388414?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
Answer:
In a crimanal trial it would be where the jursdicion is
The answer is the right of enforcement belongs to the state
Based on the fact that Anna tries to use logic as well as cause and effect, the trait she is likely strong in is B. Thinking.
<h3>What trait is Anna strong in?</h3>
Anna is most likely strong with the "thinking trait" because she shares characteristics with others who think a lot.
They try to use logical reasoning, and they use cause-and-effect associations to make decisions.
Find out more personality traits at brainly.com/question/7375078
#SPJ1
An amendment
Hope this helps :)
