1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irakobra [83]
2 years ago
15

Suppose that the U.S. government decides to charge wine producers a tax. Before the tax, 30,000 bottles of wine were sold every

week at a price of $6 per bottle. After the tax, 25,000 bottles of wine are sold every week; consumers pay $8 per bottle, and producers receive $5 per bottle (after paying the tax). The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $ per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $ per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $ per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been smaller if the tax had been levied on consumers. True False
Business
1 answer:
Over [174]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The amount of tax is:

= Price paid by consumers - Price received by producers

= 8 - 5

= $3

Burden on consumers:

= Price after tax - Price before tax

= 8 - 6

= $2

Burden on Producers:

= Amount received before tax - Amount received after tax

= 6 - 5

= $1

The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been smaller if the tax had been levied on consumers. ⇒ <u>FALSE.</u>

Tax effects are the same regardless of if levied on consumers directly or on producers.

You might be interested in
In intrapersonal communication, you use the language and symbols that were communicated to you through your culture.
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

Idek what that is XD

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
The campground will make the most economic profit whenit has property rights to a clean lake . True or False: The fish cannery w
babymother [125]

Answer:

hi your question is incomplete here is the complete question

Consider a lake found in the town of Center Barnstead,

The town has a campground whose visitors use the lake for recreation. The town also has a fish cannery that dumps industrial waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less desirable vacation destination. That is, the fish cannery's waste decreases the campground's economic profit.

Suppose that the fish cannery could use a different production method that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels safe for recreation, and the campground would no longer be affected. If the fish cannery uses the recycling method, then the fish cannery's economic profit is $1,500 per week, and the campground's economic profit is $1,800 per week. If the fish cannery does not use the recycling method, then the fish cannery's economic profit is $2,000 per week, and the campground's economic profit is $1,000 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table.

Action

Profit

Fish Cannery

Campground

Total

(Dollars)

(Dollars)

(Dollars)

No Recycling 2,000 1,000  

Recycling 1,500 1,800  

Total economic profit is highest when the recycling production method is   .

When the fish cannery uses the recycling method, the campground earns $1,800−$1,000=$800$1,800−$1,000=$800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the campground should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the fish cannery to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the fish cannery's economic profit by $2,000−$1,500=$500$2,000−$1,500=$500 per week. Therefore, the fish cannery should be willing to use the recycling method if it is compensated with at least $500 per week.

Suppose the campground has the property rights to the lake. That is, the campground has the right to a clean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish cannery will   the recycling method and will pay the campground   per week.

Now, suppose the fish cannery has the property rights to the lake, including the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no cost, the fish cannery will   the recycling method, and the campground will pay the fish cannery   per week.

ANSWER

  • True
  • True

Explanation:

The campground will make the most economic profit when it has property rights to a clean lake : True. this is true because the Fish cannery will be using the recycling method and from the table it is seen that when the recycling method is used The Campground make the most economic profit

The fish cannery will use the recycling method regardless of who has the property right : TRUE . this is because the Fish cannery will use the recycling method anyways because the recycling method would not pollute the water hence not interfering with the campground activities in case they own the property rights.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is the correct formula for profit?
Lisa [10]

Answer:

(Sales volume * Price) – (Variable costs + Fixed costs)

Explanation:

Profit is equal to Total sales less Total costs .

Here, Total costs is the addition of Variable and Fixed costs

(Sales Volume x Price) - (Variable Costs + Fixed Costs).

3 0
3 years ago
"We chose this plan because it would benefit the majority of you, and harm the fewest" would be an example of using this perspec
Alborosie

Answer:

utilitarian perspective      

Explanation:

In simple words, utilitarian approach refers to a method for making decisions in case of ethical dilemmas. Under this approach, the decision making authority makes judgement by focusing on the greater good, that is, making judgement that benefits the most of the individuals and harm the least.

This theory states that every party's interest should be taken into consideration equally as every related individual to the judgement is capable of suffering . However this approach is used when it is not possible to benefit all the stakeholders equally.

6 0
3 years ago
Consider the market for socks. The current price of a pair of plain white socks is $6.00. Two consumers, Jeff and Samir, are wil
muminat

Answer:

consumer surplus = $3.5

producer surplus = $2

Explanation:

Consumer surplus is the difference between the willingness to pay of a consumer and the price of the good.

Consumer surplus = willingness to pay – price of the good

Jeff's consumer surplus = $7 - $6 = $1

Samir's  consumer surplus = $8.50 - $6 = $2.50

total consumer surplus = $1 + $2.50 = $3.50

Producer surplus is the difference between the price of a good and the least price the seller is willing to sell the product

Producer surplus = price – least price the seller is willing to accept

Manufacturer 1's producer surplus = $6 - $4.5 = $1.50

Manufacturer 2's producer surplus = $6 - $5.50 = $0.50

total producer surplus = $1.50 + 0.50 = $2

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What habit should you follow to avoid the risk of contracting illnesses and infections
    8·1 answer
  • A security professional needs to identify a physical security control that will identify and authenticate individuals before all
    8·1 answer
  • At the beginning of the year, Plummer's Sports Center bought three used fitness machines from Brunswick Corporation. The machine
    13·1 answer
  • If the type of departmentalization used by an organization tends to emphasize departmental units rather than the organization as
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following activities are either not accounted for or are measured inaccurately in calculations of GDP for the Unite
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose that the Bureau of Labor Statistics predicts that the number of jobs for dental hygienists will grow faster than most oc
    13·1 answer
  • In the context of fixed-quantity systems,__________is defined as the on-hand quantity (oh) plus any orders placed but which have
    9·1 answer
  • Jamie ensures that his subordinates are closely guided and instructed throughout a project. He believes that this makes him a hi
    6·1 answer
  • A fixed asset with a cost of $31,588 and accumulated depreciation of $28,429.20 is sold for $5369.96. What is the amount of gain
    11·1 answer
  • Marble Construction estimates that its WACC is 10% if equity comes from retained earnings. However, if the company issues new st
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!