Which three details from the “The Emperor’s New Clothes” by Hans Christian Andersen provide the best evidence to support the fol
lowing claim? The story uses the invisible outfit as a symbol to show the prideful nature of people.
"But he has nothing at all on!" at last cried out all the people. The Emperor was vexed, for he knew that the people were right; but he thought the procession must go on now!
The rogues sat up the whole of the night before the day on which the procession was to take place, and had sixteen lights burning, so that everyone might see how anxious they were to finish the Emperor's new suit.
"How splendid his Majesty looks in his new clothes, and how well they fit!" everyone cried out. "What a design! What colors! These are indeed royal robes!"
And accordingly he praised the stuff he could not see, and declared that he was delighted with both colors and patterns. "Indeed, please your Imperial Majesty," said he to his sovereign when he returned, "the cloth which the weavers are preparing is extraordinarily magnificent."
Many years ago, there was an Emperor, who was so excessively fond of new clothes, that he spent all his money in dress. He did not trouble himself in the least about his soldiers; nor did he care to go either to the theatre or the chase, except for the opportunities then afforded him for displaying his new clothes.
just tell me what one is wrong because there are only 4 choices and 1 wrong one
This is ironic because she is actually describing herself because of her affair with Elizabeth's husband John. Abigail herself is lying by accusing Tituba and other women of witchcraft
