Answer:
C) There was no price control on gasoline at the time.
Explanation:
During the 1970s the US government established a price ceiling on gasoline, but as all price ceilings set below the equilibrium price, it results in both a deadweight loss and a supply shortage.
Since the price is "too cheap", then the quantity demanded will be more than the quantity supplied. Rising costs in gasoline production made things worst, since suppliers were constantly reducing their supply of gasoline, while consumer demand was constantly increasing.
Answer:
C. Total cost per unit times mark-up percentage per unit
Explanation:
The mark-up percentage is assumed to be computed by dividing the desired profit by the total cost.
The dollar amount of the mark-up per unit shall be computed by multiplying the total cost per unit with the markup percentage per unit.
The selling price of the product can be computed by adding the mark-up per unit to the cost price of each unit.
Answer:
B. Inferior good
Explanation:
In this case, total income increased because of the promotion and a 16 percent raise. Because of this, the consumption of frozen hot dogs decreased. If the demand for a good or service decreases due to an increase in income, then this is an inferior good. This kind of goods are the opposite of normal goods, because the demand for those increase when there is an increase in income.
Answer:
Legal obligation will arise from inadvertence of one thing or a deliberate act. There are 3 categories of erroneous conduct lawfully. Its fissure of agreement, corruption and one who is pretentious or abraded thanks to the act of additional person.
(1)
The necessities that the automobile should demonstrate to carry mister. Embarrassed of carelessness are as per RES IPSA LOQUITUR belief. The belief RES IPSA LOQUITUR suggests that "the factor expresses for himself". In keeping with this opinion, the broken or damage himself is that the resistant and it expresses for the performance of the inattention. This belief needs the subsequent things:
- The affair or act ought to happen thanks to the carelessness
- the carelessness ought to cause some injury or damage
- the litigant ought to have fashionable management over the device or instrumentality.
- The casualty shouldn't have underwrote something to the carelessness.
(2)
Permitting to the law of carelessness, underneath request of householders and operatives of vehicles, P. Suppliers are control lawfully chargeable for the grievance to the automobile. In keeping with this, the vendor of vehicle United Nations agency energies sloppily and origins grievance is liable for the obligation produced to the broken individual. The proprietor will have the instruction of last vibrant probability. Enclose if the worker of the car isn't the proprietor then the possessor is not liable for the act of the carelessness of the worker delivered if there's associate deficiency of agency association. During this case, agency association exists. Thus, P Distributors are control chargeable for the injury to the celebration.
(b)
The possessor of vehicle United Nations agency drives inaccurately and causes grievance is liable for the liability produced to the broken individual. The possessor will have the instruction of last vibrant probability. In case, if the worker of the car isn't the possessor then the proprietor is not liable for the performance of the carelessness of the worker delivered if there's associate deficiency of agency association. During this case each belief of RES IPSA LOQUITUR and regulation of carelessness are pertinent. Thus, the Mr. Tom is control chargeable for the performance of his partner.
Answer:
A. Smoothing
Explanation:
The smoothing approach is a conflict resolution technique that occurs when the project manager seeks to resolve the conflict by seeking an agreement that is beneficial to everyone, that is, seeking to reach consensus on a certain situation to mitigate divergences and thus focus back to work and not conflict.
This technique is a quick solution for the resolution of conflicts that is generally effective in the short term, because the conflict, even if it exists, is left aside while there is a viable solution, such as what happened in the question, that despite the two managers want the team member working for him full time, each of the managers gave in to have the employee working part time for each one.
