<span>Unfortunately, we are not given with the passage so that we will be able to identify the topic and answer this item. However, it should be noted that the topic of the passage is usually the first sentence of the passage so readers can already grasp the idea. The answer is therefore letter A. </span>
McCarthyism is nothing more than a witch hunt. A lot of finger pointing and not a lot of proof. Both parties (Democrat & Republican) in the United States use this in todays world. Ill give examples of both and follow up with how it can be beneficial to each party.
Democrats: Accuse other politicians of being "racist" or "bigoted" just from political ideas and from certain members of the base. While it is not fact or true that Republicans are by policy racist, it is a word that is hated by people and has a negative connotation to it, forcing some to keep distance from said person
Republicans: Accuse other politicians of being "muslin lovers" or "muslins" themselves. We saw this for the entire Obama presidency. Congress and some Republican supporters would use the word "muslin" to describe the president in order to give a negative connotation towards Obama. This has some strong effectiveness due to the recent events (September 11th, 2001).
Both parties are trying to stick a negative idea/precedent/description about the opposition in order to sway votes. This tactic is very effective because not only will you sway votes, theres little repercussion in doing so because the people who disagree with you are not going to be swayed, but that voter in the middle who cares about one issue over the other (in this case racism over fear of muslims or vice versa fear of muslims over racism).
Either someone is intelligent enough to know the rhetoric between the two parties and votes by policy (unaffected / no positive or negative response), they don't care about either issue (unaffected / no positive or negative response), or someone is strongly in favor of one or the other (strong positive or negative response).
While there are some attempts that have been made and can be made that would be so egregious that most people have a negative response, but that rarely happens and would be deemed political suicide.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
Im very confused, you should provide more information, so us as an audience can provide you with the most credible answer.
Explanation:
It can be inferred that the meaning of courses in the second paragraph on page 64 of Castle Diary is:
" The different dishes served in a meal" (Option C)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above answer?</h3>
Tobias Burgess, a young page (attendant of nobles), is the protagonist of Castle Diary. Tobias kept a record of his adventures in his uncle's castle in 1285, including everything from boar hunts to domestic tasks.
On page 64, he describes a dinner and the feast that was held. He talked about how ale relaxed the pages and how nuances made from sugar and almond were presented at the conclusion of each of the four courses, which in this case signified the various foods served in a dinner.
<h3>What is an inference?</h3>
When a conclusion is reached regarding a subject-matter, after extension rationalization, the conclusion reached is called an inference.
Learn more about inference:
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
Full Question:
What is the meaning of the word courses in the second paragraph in castle dairy on page 64?
a. The routes of ships
b. The chases in a hunt
c. The different dishes served in a meal
d. The movements of an animal
D. A bird.
The voice from the cuckoo bird is breaking silence.
