Rondo is the answer to the question
Answer:
D. Design refers to the overall organization of a work of art, where as technique refers to the way the artist used the materials to create a desired outcome or impression.
Explanation:
A. is not the right answer. The technique is not what materials are used, but the way and skill with which they are used.
B. is not the correct answer. These are not the right definitions for technique nor design.
C. is not the right answer. The definition of design is actually what technique is, while the definition of technique is wrong.
<u> D. is the right answer. This is exactly what design (organization and plan of the piece of art) and technique (the way on which work of art is executed) are. </u>
Answer:
We don’t live in two dimensions. But what about characters? Saying they are multi-dimensional or “round" is a compliment frequently paid to characters, but there is often some confusion to what the term “round” really means. This can make it difficult to tell if a fictional figure is round or not, and why it even makes a difference.
So, what is a round character? Are they, by definition, better-written? In this post, we define the qualities of a round character, illustrated by multiple examples from literature which demonstrate what makes round characters so compelling.
Explanation:
Answer:
ong
Explanation:Thomas Jefferson often argued vehemently for the freedom of belief as a freedom all individuals should enjoy. If judges were to make rulings about the beliefs of others, that would be a confusing of religious and civil spheres. Jefferson drafted a bill regarding freedom of religious belief in 1777 ... and his views ultimately were enacted into law in 1786. In his Statute of Religious Freedom, Jefferson wrote:
"Our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, any more than our opinions in physics or geometry. ... To allow the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion, and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency, is a dangerous fallacy, which at once destroys all religious liberty, because he being of course judge of the tendency will make his opinions the rule of judgment; and approve or condemn the sentiments of others only as they shall square with or differ from his own."
