The Inca empire was known for advances that bettered their community and kept balance from within. Some of the things that empires like the Inca used we still may use today.
The Inca had very advanced road systems that they used very frequently. These roads were used primarily for communication and trading goods. Communication, as you can imagine, was very hard back in those days. There was no phone or barely a good mail system, so if someone you knew lived far away, it would be very hard to keep in touch. There were certain message carriers, that would carry messages down these roads to different people.
The Inca also had a very complex government and taxing system. It is very hard to believe that civilizations so far back in time could keep track of things such as government and taxing, even though they didn't keep any written records or anything like we do today. The Inca is known for its complex, advanced, and well done government. This government was called the "<em>Tawantinsuyu</em>" and had numerous people keeping watch over the civilians and how much they paid in taxes, but had one ruler among everyone.
Empires, such as the Inca empire, had to do with many of our advances today and it is astonishing how much they accomplished back in that time.
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, the answer is that he offended the pride of the South, since he was anti-slavery. </span>
Answer and Explanation:
Judge Kennedy's position on the death penalty for offenders under the age of 18 shows a pattern of decency that promotes the progress of society because it allows these young people to be judged by their mental abilities that are more fragile than the mental abilities of an adult. This positioning shows that the young man's mind is still in formation and that is why participation in a heinous crime is not enough to promote this young person to the death penalty. This is relevant because it shows that the death penalty is something extreme and should be considered taking into account the individual's biological and mental constitution.
Answer:
The miasma theory (also called the miasmatic theory) is an obsolete medical theory that held diseases—such as cholera, chlamydia, or the Black Death—were caused by a miasma (μίασμα, ancient Greek: "pollution"), a noxious form of "bad air", also known as night air.
Answer:
B. Historian A wants to make the colonists appear in a negative light by suggesting that they did not really believe in freedom for all.
Explanation:
The whole point of the American Revolution is that the colonists wanted to overthrow the oppressive British government who was imposing more and more taxes on them. Historian A believed that the American colonists were wrong in starting the Revolution, because they were 1) well protected by the British, and that 2) they do not act on what they want.
For example, the American Revolution was basically the 13 Colonies trying to win freedom from the "oppressive" United Kingdom. However, the historian points out that while they themselves know how it feels like to be under oppression, they do not think of their slaves as those who, like them, wanted freedom. This is a "looking-down" view, and the slaves should have been freed at the end of the Revolutionary War. This proves that the US citizens did not believe of "freedom & rights for all", but rather, only for white males.
~
