Answer:
The correct answer is: units-of-production.
Explanation:
In the depreciation method per production units, an annual production quantity is assigned according to the total calculation of potential units that can be produced in the useful life of the good. In order to calculate the total value, the units that were actually produced must be multiplied by the depreciation cost of each unit.
Answer:
The Federal Trade Commission Act is a law passed in 1914.
Answer:
The correct option is D
Labour budget = $1,974,175
Explanation:
The labour budget is the product of the standard labour cost per unit and the budgeted production in units
Labour budget = standard labour cost× production budget in unit
The production budget can bed determined by adjusting the sales budget for closing and opening inventories.
Production budget = Sales budget +closing inventory - opening inventory
Production budget = 39,000 + 100 -200 = 38,900 units
Labour budget = $14.50× 3.5× 38,900 = $1,974,175
Labour budget = $1,974,175
Answer:
During the first year, the marginal cost equals approximately the minimum EUAC cost. This is why the minimum cost of EUAC to maintain the defender throughout the year is $21,000. Since the minimum EUAC cost to maintain the defender the first year is less than the minimum EUAC cost to the challenger, the defender should not be substituted. This means, it is not economically feasible to make the replacement at this time.
Explanation:
According to the exercise, it is necessary to evaluate to know if it is economic to replace the defender by the challenger. For the calculation, the defender's information is: the defender's market value up to $3000. The expenses are $20000. The information regarding the challenger is: the installation cost $30000, the annual expenses $ 16000, the surrender value $ 2000, the economic life is 12 years, and the interest rate before taxes is 15%.
The minimum EUAC for the challenger is equal to:
The minimal cost is equal to:
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
If investors prefer firms that retain most of their earnings, then a firm that wants to maximize its stock price should set a low payout ratio.
And her in a case of a retired individual who lives on his or her investment income, then it would make sense for this person to prefer stocks with high payouts so he or she could receive cash without going to the trouble and expense of selling stocks. On the other hand, it would make sense for an individual who would just reinvest any dividends received to prefer a low-payout company because that would save him or her taxes and brokerage costs.
