Good thinking coming on here but we cannot write a summary for you. They are really easy to write tho. Type the passage and I could possibly do it for u
Answer: It supported the District Court’s decision that the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Explanation:
The case of Ingraham v. Wright was heard in 1976 in the Supreme court based on an event that happened in 1970 where James Ingraham was paddled by the principal of a public high school in Florida to the point of needing medical assistance.
The district court the case was first heard in dismissed it and the Court of Appeals upheld this dismissal.
The Supreme court then agreed with the District court in saying that corporal punishment did not infringe upon Constitutional rights so the students’ constitutional rights had not been violated.
Answer:
C. The fakir's prediction that anyone who interfere with fate will be sorry.
Explanation:
This is the correct answer.
True because if you’re a mess and not organized you won’t really be or feel prepared.
Well to be honest, of the Military forces attacking Isis is dangerous and so is not doing it. I would say attacking Isis is 95% better than not because what if people ended up getting injured again.
