Answer:
If you're looking for the subject, the answer is "Unless I can find my sneakers"
If you're looking for the <u>predicate</u>, the answer is "<u>I won't be able to go to the game</u>"
Explanation:
Nothing Gold Can Stay was the reflection of the seasonal cycle of nature. The poem though a short one symbolizes what a Mother Nature cannot hold for long the 'Gold' but respects its value/worth.
Explanation:
In this poem, Robert Frost brings out the deep meaning of how few things that are of high value/worth are not treated properly/not respected for their worth. He talks about how Nature (In the poem, he keeps referring it as 'Her') being the Mother of all subjects on Earth.
He starts explaining about the season with a leaf, its color and how it slowly transforms into a bud, turns into a flower and then eventually, a fruit. This cycle, Frost writes in the most metaphorical way for readers to understand what we need to take an advantage of and what we must value, accordingly.
This poem is a classic example of how humans forget what is worthy as we can find it everywhere and look out for things that we do not have in our surroundings.
Answer:
The type of evidence that Machiavelli uses to support his claim in the passage is logical
I hope you have a good day :)
Answer: When I felt my wings were ready, slid from our home branch as smoothly as a snake through the grass.
Explanation: This sentence is comparing two different things to each other and it uses the word as. A simile must have the word like or as in it, otherwise it is a metaphor.
Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
