Erik Homberger Erikson (born Erik Salomonsen; 15 June 1902 – 12 May 1994) was a German-American developmental psychologist and psychoanalyst known for his theory on psychological development of human beings. He may be most famous for coining the phrase identity crisis.
Answer:
For wealthy Romans, life was good. They lived in beautiful houses – often on the hills outside Rome, away from the noise and the smell. They enjoyed an extravagant lifestyle with luxurious furnishings, surrounded by servants and slaves to cater to their every desire. Many would hold exclusive dinner parties and serve their guests the exotic dishes of the day.
and for the poor
,
Poorer Romans, however, could only dream of such a life. Sweating it out in the city, they lived in shabby, squalid houses that could collapse or burn at any moment. If times were hard, they might abandon newborn babies to the streets, hoping that someone else would take them in as a servant or slave. Poor in wealth but strong in numbers, they were the Roman mob, who relaxed in front of the popular entertainment of the time – chariot races between opposing teams, or gladiators fighting for their life, fame and fortune.
Although their lives may have been different, they did have some things in common. In any Roman family life, the head of the household was a man. Although his wife looked after the household, he controlled it. He alone could own property. Only he decided the fate of his children and who they would marry.
Explanation:
Here's photos of the essay. I can't submit it here.
I've made a mistake above. It's 'use them to buys things to your heart's content'.
Answer:
FDR implemented many government programs.
Explanation:
Government programs are generally at odds with the idea of laissez-faire capitalism. Laissez-Faire capitalism refers to the economic idea in which market forces drive the market, and thus an invisible hand is often pictured with it. Instead of having the government pass programs to solve problems, laissez-faire economists believe that the market will solve societal issues (war, poverty, famine, social programs, etc.).
Thus, FDR's actions do not line up with this method because he was in the field of using government programs to solve the issues that arose after the war. FDR spent more money on the government, opposing the idea that market forces alone would help the U.S. out of the recession. FDR's First 100 Days program, in which he attempted to pass as much legislation as possible, particularly contradicts the idea of the invisible hand guiding the market.
