Answer:
430
Step-by-step explanation:
761-331=430
Answer:
The experimental probability of rolling a 2 is 
.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since you didn't give any statements, I'll make one myself.
P of rolling a 2 (experimental): 
The experimental probability of rolling a 2 is .
The concentration of solution would be the amount of the molecule divided by the volume. In this case, the solution concentration is 36% and the volume is 4 quarts + 1 quarts= 5 quarts. You are asked the concentration before 1 quarts added. The alcohol content should be same for both solutions. The answer should be:
concentration = alcohol content/ volume
alcohol content =concentration * volume
alcohol content1 =alcohol content2
36% * 5 quarts = concentration2 * 4quarts
concentration2= 36% * 5 quarts / 4 quarts= 45%
The answer is D (y+10)(y-6)
because
Okay I think there has been a transcription issue here because it appears to me there are two answers. However I can spot where some brackets might be missing, bear with me on that.
A direct variation, a phrase I haven't heard before, sounds a lot like a direct proportion, something I am familiar with. A direct proportion satisfies two criteria:
The gradient of the function is constant s the independent variable (x) varies
The graph passes through the origin. That is to say when x = 0, y = 0.
Looking at these graphs, two can immediately be ruled out. Clearly A and D pass through the origin, and the gradient is constant because they are linear functions, so they are direct variations.
This leaves B and C. The graph of 1/x does not have a constant gradient, so any stretch of this graph (to y = k/x for some constant k) will similarly not be direct variation. Indeed there is a special name for this function, inverse proportion/variation. It appears both B and C are inverse proportion, however if I interpret B as y = (2/5)x instead, it is actually linear.
This leaves C as the odd one out.
I hope this helps you :)
