Im asian so slay I’ll explain.
EXPLANATION : Back then rivers were important to many settlements such as ancient Egypt because they grow crops, etc. Its the same thing for ancient china. The yellow river was a important river because it provided farmland for china and was basically born for farming.The yellow river’s water carries silt which is how it got its name and when the river would flow it leaves yellow residue behind. Silk was important to ancient china because back then they traded with other places a lot and silk was a main material that was traded.
Yas: I hope this was helpful and sorry if I explained it in a very longgg way
Answer:
D. 25 million (a very conservative estimation)
Explanation:
The British Raj was the territorial entity in actual India under the British rule which lasted from 1858 to 1947, in which happened 8 nationwide famines, which are described below:
1) Upper Doab Famine (1860 - 1861) - 2 million dead.
2) Orissa Famine (1865 - 1867) - 4 million dead.
3) Rajputana Famine (1869) - 1.5 million dead.
4) Bihar Famine (1873 - 1874) - No significant deaths due to relief efforts.
5) Southern Indian Famine (1876 - 1878) - 6 million dead.
6) Indian Famine (1896 - 1897) - 12 million dead.
7) Indian Famine (1899 - 1900) - 3 million dead.
8) Bengal Famine (1943) - 1.5 million dead.
Total death toll: 30 million
The option that is a better approximation is D.
Answer:
take the case to the United States Supreme Court
Explanation:
From the scenario given, it can be inferred that the case has been decided at the court of the first instance, which is the lower court.
Also, the court has been decided at the first appellate court, which is the court of appeals. Then If Wag's lawyer wants to appeal this decision, (, the decision of the court of appeal) he will " take the case to the United States Supreme Court."
This is because it is the Supreme Court that has jurisdiction over the appeal courts.
Note: since it is not specified that the case is exclusive of the state laws, then it is assumed that the automobile accident, in this case, involved federal laws.
Hence, the next step is to "take the case to the United States Supreme Court"
Answer: He was intelligent enough to lead from the rear, thereby protecting himself from an early death
Explanation:
Part of the success of the conquests of Alexander the Great was down to the complete loyalty and respect his men had for him. This was down to him leading them with empathy. For instance, when their horses died and soldiers had to walk, he would walk with them and if food was scarce, he would go hungry with his men.
Perhaps the most evident act of this leadership style was Alexander in battle. He preferred to lead his men from the front especially the cavalry instead of hiding and commanding behind them. This way he not only inspired his troops but was able to see the battle in real time and make adjustments if necessary.
