Answer:
Visual capture
Explanation:
When two sensory stimuli are presented simultaneously, vision is capable of dominating and capturing the other.
Visual cues are powerful cues that can distract us from other sensations, so when an individual is in an environment, and multiple stimuli reach the brain at once, there is a hierarchy in which vision is on top of this hierarchy and will guide our general perception.
In the example, when <u>we are watching a listening to a movie with subtitles there's a conflict between vision and ear</u>.
When a conflict of this type occurs, the sense that will predominate is vision and this is called visual capture.
Answer:
In a religious context, myths are storied vehicles of supreme truth, the most basic and important truths of all. By them people regulate and interpret their lives and find worth and purpose in their existence. Myths put one in touch with sacred realities, the fundamental sources of being, power, and truth.
Explanation:
Hi!! It's Anne and I am here to help you through your problem. This is not technically a question, but I believe you mean to ask: What is the opposite of endure?
There are a couple antonyms for endure such as:
-fade
-short-lived
The EXACT definition of endure FROM THE DICTIONARY is to remain in existence, or last.
Choose mine as brainliest please have a great day (:
The correct answer is interested in.
All other possible answer don't fit grammatically or don't make sense if used.
I just read part of the biography of a little-known Canadian amateur geologist from New Brunswick who had only a grammar school education but became one of the first to find a major type locality for a very important Precambrian fossils-the stromatolites. His name was George Frederic Matthew and he lived from 1837-1923. The theme of the biography could be that, at the time he lived, during the latter part of the Industrial Revolution, it was common for men to have wide interests and in fact his work was as a customs agent but he became a very good amateur paleontologist by applying himself to that subject especially in the field. In the account I read it says, "Employed as a customs agent, and not as a paleontologist, he was never able to pursue any single field of paleontology with the resources available to his colleagues" As well as describing the Archaezooan acadiense stromatolites he also found many Cambrian fossils, showing how it is not necessarily formal training and being from a prosperous family that determines how good a natural scientist is, but his passion for the subject.