Answer:
In literary and historical analysis, presentism is the anachronistic introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past. Modern historians seek to avoid presentism in their work because they consider it a form of cultural bias, and believe it creates a distorted understanding of their subject matter.[1] The practice of presentism is regarded by some as a common fallacy when writing about the past.
<h2>En muchas ocasiones he tenido que defender una idea, tanto en el colegio como con amigos y familiares, puesto que parte de tener una identidad es defender y debatir nuestras ideas
</h2><h2>
</h2><h2>
</h2><h2>La forma en que defendí mi idea fue la siguiente:
</h2><h2>
</h2><h2>Presenté mis ideas claras y concisas.
</h2><h2>Argumenté cada una de las bases de las mismas.
</h2><h2>Respondí las dudas generadas por la controversia.
</h2><h2>Escuché y pedí que me escucharan.
</h2><h2></h2>
<span>The colonial leaders decided on appointing George Washington as commander of the
Continental Army and prepared for the American Revolution by asking the
colonies for helping fund the American Revolution. They alsoalso asked a
committee to write a Declaration of Independence which was read July
4, 1776.
Hope I was able to help! :)
</span>
Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho conducted the secret talks outside of the formal Paris peace talks.
C.) because Child Labor Laws were not passed yet and they had to help on farms.
