1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stells [14]
3 years ago
7

The map above supports the conclusion that the partition of India resulted in:

History
1 answer:
Butoxors [25]3 years ago
5 0

Hello. You did not present the map to which this question refers, which makes it impossible for it to be answered. However, taking into account the historical context of the partition of India and the context of the response options, we can consider that the option selected above, is the correct answer, because it is a fact.

The partition of India occurred after the country became independent from the British Empire. At that time, the country had difficulties in maintaining political and governmental order, in addition to suffering a strong religious crisis, which was what was the great trigger for the division of India into two countries: India and Pakistan.

Pakistan was dominated by Muslim forces, which forced a large number of Hindu citizens to migrate to India, where they could practice their religion without suffering any reprisals.

You might be interested in
Why were there two different views about the way in which korea might be reunified?
UNO [17]
Communism v. Capitalism/Democracy--the UN split Korea along the 38th parallel and the North was under USSR influence and the South was under Western influence from the US. 

The North and the USSR believed Korea would be best to be unified under a communist government and the South and the US believed it would be best to unify Korea under a democratic government. The Korean War began with the North making an attempt to unify the country. 
7 0
4 years ago
Prior to the Revolution, who had ruled Russia?
Ymorist [56]
According to google, "<span>Russia had an autocratic government prior to the Russian Revolution, being ruled by one person, Tsar Nicholas II. It did have an elected body called the Duma, which was instituted after a small revolution in 1905 by Tsar Nicholas II, however it had virtually no power to make laws that the Tsar had to honor." Hope this helps :)</span>
3 0
4 years ago
How was the U.S. economy after WWII?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

The period from the end of World War II to the early 1970s was one of the greatest eras of economic expansion in world history. In the US, Gross Domestic Product increased from $228 billion in 1945 to just under $1.7 trillion in 1975. By 1975, the US economy represented some 35% of the entire world industrial output, and the US economy was over 3 times larger than that of Japan, the next largest economy. The expansion was interrupted in the United States by five recessions.

$200 billion in war bonds matured, and the G.I. Bill financed a well-educated work force. The middle class swelled, as did GDP and productivity. The US underwent its own golden age of economic growth. This growth was distributed fairly evenly across the economic classes, which some attribute to the strength of labor unions in this period—labor union membership peaked during the 1950s. Much of the growth came from the movement of low-income farm workers into better-paying jobs in the towns and cities—a process largely completed by 1960.

:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anyone that can explain this in their own words the best will get Brainly
Goshia [24]

Answer:

Explanation:

1) This quote tells us that before WWI there was even war on the brink before them as well and that country's were fighting one another themselves.

2) Alliances with the countries can give you more military power and fire power making it easier to seduce another nation, however if you were a nation that had a week alliance with another then welcoming war would not be a good idea being that they would literaly destroy you.

8 0
3 years ago
Sea level increases when the number and size of glaciers on Earth increase.<br><br> True<br> False
exis [7]

The correct answer is false.

It is false that sea level increases when the number and size of glaciers on Earth increase.

It is exactly the opposite. Sea levels increase when the big glaciers melt. That glacier was frozen water and when it melts down that huge amount of water goes back to the oceans, increasing its level. Global warming is a big factor in the melting of the ice caps in the poles, and this is alarming scientists that tried to create consciousness in major power governments to do something to combat global warming.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where did three other revolutions take place in 1830, and what was a common cause of all of them?
    12·1 answer
  • Which previous governor of Texas was considered a hero to the Grange, Farmers' Alliance and Texas Farmers' Union?
    10·1 answer
  • During the 1932 election: a. Herbert Hoover apologized to the American public for failing them and promised to repeal Prohibitio
    15·1 answer
  • With what you know about the Roman Republic, why would people want to live under the rule of the Roman Republic rather than a mo
    6·2 answers
  • Which territory of the West held a
    15·1 answer
  • How true was the statement by the journalist who wrote after September 11, 2001, "Nothing has changed…Everything has changed"?
    11·1 answer
  • What languages do they speak in Israel
    6·2 answers
  • Franklin Roosevelt's: freedom speech. At least answer 1. (15+)
    5·1 answer
  • How did foreign companies affect Latin American countries
    6·1 answer
  • What rights did John Locke believe each citizen<br> had based on “natural law”?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!