1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nadya68 [22]
3 years ago
6

Read the first two stanzas of "Foreign Lands". Which excerpt contains hyperbole?

English
2 answers:
astraxan [27]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: the answer is c

Explanation: I got I right on the test :)

sweet [91]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

C

Explanation:

You might be interested in
We've got a job by cynthia levinson
Pie
I don’t get it, can you explain your question please?
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are three reasons that the constitutional convention decided they needed a document to me please the articles of confederat
CaHeK987 [17]

Any of these should suffice.


1. The states didn’t act immediately. It took until February 1779 for 12 states to approve the document. Maryland held out until March 1781, after it settled a land argument with Virginia.


2. The central government was designed to be very, very weak. The Articles established “the United States of America” as a perpetual union formed to defend the states as a group, but it provided few central powers beyond that. But it didn’t have an executive official or judicial branch.


3. The Articles Congress only had one chamber and each state had one vote. This reinforced the power of the states to operate independently from the central government, even when that wasn’t in the nation’s best interests.


4. Congress needed 9 of 13 states to pass any laws. Requiring this high supermajority made it very difficult to pass any legislation that would affect all 13 states.


5. The document was practically impossible to amend. The Articles required unanimous consent to any amendment, so all 13 states would need to agree on a change. Given the rivalries between the states, that rule made the Articles impossible to adapt after the war ended with Britain in 1783.


6. The central government couldn’t collect taxes to fund its operations. The Confederation relied on the voluntary efforts of the states to send tax money to the central government. Lacking funds, the central government couldn’t maintain an effective military or back its own paper currency.


7. States were able to conduct their own foreign policies. Technically, that role fell to the central government, but the Confederation government didn’t have the physical ability to enforce that power, since it lacked domestic and international powers and standing.


8. States had their own money systems. There wasn’t a common currency in the Confederation era. The central government and the states each had separate money, which made trade between the states, and other countries, extremely difficult.


9. The Confederation government couldn’t help settle Revolutionary War-era debts. The central government and the states owed huge debts to European countries and investors. Without the power to tax, and with no power to make trade between the states and other countries viable, the United States was in an economic mess by 1787.


10. Shays’ rebellion – the final straw. A tax protest by western Massachusetts farmers in 1786 and 1787 showed the central government couldn’t put down an internal rebellion. It had to rely on a state militia sponsored by private Boston business people. With no money, the central government couldn't act to protect the "perpetual union."

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the paragraph from “Rivers and Stories,” Part 2, by Robert Hass.
elena-s [515]
I’m on the same question lol
8 0
3 years ago
can you write me a paragraph of 8 sentences about smoking in public places, make sure to argue with it and against it.
timurjin [86]

Answer:

smoking in public place should be banned

Explanation:

Smoking cigarettes, cigars or pipes in public places should be banned because it’s offensive to the non-smokers who have to endure the smoke, the butts, the mess and the smell. Consider the typical public place – a market door entrance, a park bench, an elevator. People come to these places for peace and quiet, for necessity, to get to work, so they should not be required to breathe another person’s poisonous tobacco fumes. Everyone knows that second-hand smoke is just as, if not more, dangerous than directly inhaling the smoke.

3 0
3 years ago
How was the Stanford prison experiment set up?
kari74 [83]

=The Stanford prison experiment (SPE) was a social psychology experiment that attempted to investigate the psychological effects of perceived power, focusing on the struggle between prisoners and prison officers. It was conducted at Stanford University on the days of August 14–20, 1971, by a research group led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo using college students.[1] In the study, volunteers were randomly assigned to be either "guards" or "prisoners" in a mock prison, with Zimbardo himself serving as the superintendent. Several "prisoners" left mid-experiment, and the whole experiment was abandoned after six days. Early reports on experimental results claimed that students quickly embraced their assigned roles, with some guards enforcing authoritarian measures and ultimately subjecting some prisoners to psychological torture, while many prisoners passively accepted psychological abuse and, by the officers' request, actively harassed other prisoners who tried to stop it. The experiment has been described in many introductory social psychology textbooks,[2] although some have chosen to exclude it because its methodology is sometimes questioned.[3]

The U.S. Office of Naval Research[4] funded the experiment as an investigation into the causes of difficulties between guards and prisoners in the United States Navy and United States Marine Corps. Certain portions of it were filmed, and excerpts of footage are publicly available.

Some of the experiment's findings have been called into question, and the experiment has been criticized for unscientific methodology and possible fraud.[5][6] Whereas the experiment purported to show that prison guards instinctively embraced sadistic and authoritarian personalities, Zimbardo actually instructed the "guards" to exert psychological control over the "prisoners". Critics also noted that some of the participants behaved in a way that would help the study, so that, as one "guard" later put it, "the researchers would have something to work with," which is known as demand characteristics. Variants of the experiment have been performed by other researchers, but none of these attempts have replicated the results of the SPE.

Hope this helps and hope this is whst you are looking for!

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a example sentence for ethos - freedom
    12·1 answer
  • 1)What is effective talk? <br> 2)What are the components?
    11·1 answer
  • During editing and proofreading, you do not need to
    14·2 answers
  • What is the meaning ?<br> *”if you think someone could use a friend be one” -unknown author
    14·1 answer
  • Career development is best defined as a
    14·1 answer
  • A position control or leadership
    15·1 answer
  • Read the passage. Then, answer the questions.
    11·2 answers
  • The main character, Eric Haskins, meets many people along the way that play into the major plot of the story. Name Three of thes
    14·1 answer
  • Write 2 simple sentences wit 2 subjects and 1 verb.​
    10·1 answer
  • What would a duty ethicist say about spanking
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!