Calm somewhat bitter-sweet moments, the end
Answer:
The subject would be Lionel Messi.
Explanation:
Answer:
Recoding the interview without asking for the permission..
Explanation:
Recording an interview is helpful for the researcher to always go back to what exactly interviewee said. This helps in the clarification and also develops accuracy.
But, the most important thing before recording an interview is to always ask the interviewee permission. Ethically (in some places legally) it is always good to ask for the permission to record the interview. Sometimes people may not be comfortable being recorded so it is good to ask for their consent.
In the given scenario, the researcher made the mistake of not asking for the consent of the interviewee to record the interview. As is states that the researcher just sat and hit the record button, it does not mention that the researcher took permission.
So, the correct answer is that the researcher did not take the permission to record the interview.
<span>Lennie keeps asking for ketchup when they don't have any.
Glad I could help!
</span>
Answer:
In the final chapter, Jekyll's letter highlights one of the main themes of the novel, the dual nature of man. It is this concept that caused him to pursue his disastrous experiments that led to his downfall. Hyde, the personification of Jekyll's purely evil characteristics, revels in the freedom of an anonymous existence. Although he successfully distills his evil side, Jekyll still remains a combination of good and evil. Thus, when transforming back and forth, his evil side grows stronger and more powerful after years of repression, and is able to take over completely. In this way, Jekyll's experiments are the opposite of what he hoped. Interestingly, as is repeatedly mentioned throughout the novel, Hyde is a small man often called dwarfish, while Jekyll is a man of large stature. Thus, the reader is left to assume that Jekyll's evil side is much weaker and less developed than his good side. However, appearances can be deceiving. In fact, Hyde's strength far out powers Jekyll's.
In his letter, Jekyll clearly states that he felt no guilt about Hyde's actions, as "Henry Jekyll stood at times aghast before the acts of Edward Hyde, but the situation was apart from ordinary laws, and insidiously relaxed the grasp of conscience. It was Hyde, after all, and Hyde alone, that was guilty." To the reader, this explanation seems ridiculous, because Hyde is in fact part of Jekyll, and a being that Jekyll created. Therefore, clearly Jekyll is responsible for the man's actions.
Explanation: