The answers are
-<span>States that already had slavery could remain so
-H</span><span>e did not want to see slavery grow any more.
Although he later would push for the Emancipation Proclamation and full abolition of slavery, Abraham Lincoln ran as a moderate voice in the Republican Party. He followed the official party line at the time of anti-expansion: no new slave states. This meant that states that had slavery could remain so, and he did not want to see slavery grow any further. </span>
Answer: Yes the US should have gone to war. There are two sides to the topic, Yes and No. Yes because if we did not go to war with mexico we would not own all the present 50 states. No because war is expensive.
Explanation:
So for Yes you could write. The United States should have gone to war with mexico because, if they didn't then the United states would not be what it is today. A second reason is we needed the resources they had on there territory.
For no you could write. The United States should not have gone to war with mexico because, war is expensive for ammo and troops, a second reason is it was expensive for allies and reinforcements, and shipment.
Answer: By war's end, it was the world's largest railroad system. Other Northern industries--weapons manufacturing, leather goods, iron production, textiles--grew and improved as the war progressed.From 1945 to 1970, several factors influenced Georgia's growth. The shift from rural agrarianism to factory jobs after World War II resulted in larger urban populations. Atlanta developed into a recognizable metropolis due to the roles of two influential mayors – William B. Hartsfield and Ivan Allen Jr. Once viewed primarily as a cotton state, Georgia now consistently ranks first in the nation's production of poultry and eggs and is also a top producer of peanuts, pecans, tobacco, blueberries, and peaches. Overall, the state accounts for 2 percent of total U.S. agricultural sales.
They feared being invaded and threatened by NATO because of NATO's exercise of nuclear capability.
