If someone takes your property without your permission then the judge and the person the property was taken from has the right to say what property was his or hers. The law did not help the government maintain order because it was hard to prove the property had originally been yours and there were not punishments for stealing, they simply had to return the items.
He is a poet who wrote stories, books, and plays
Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
Paintings using a fresco technique has been copied by neighbouring countries.
Option 4
<u>Explanation:
</u>
Maharaja Sri Gupta's Gupta Empire was an old Indian state spanning most of the Indian subcontinent from around 320-550 EC.
The Gupta reign started a period of peace and development, as it was expanded by territorial expansion by war, characterized by advances in science, technology, architecture, poetry, dialectics, poetry, logic, arithmetic, theology, philosophy and theology.
A Golden age of India characterized by vast discoveries and inventions in science, innovation, architecture, poetry, dialectics, literature, logic, arithmetic, theology, religion, and philosophy started to flourish in the Gupta Empire.
