Search Results
Featured snippet from the web
Though the word "slavery" does not appear in the Constitution, the issue was central to the debates over commerce and representation. The "Three-Fifths Compromise" provided that three-fifths (60%) of enslaved people in each state would count toward congressional representation, increasing the number of Southern seats.
the legislative branch passes laws,
the executive branch enforces laws, and
the judicial branch interprets laws
It is controvertial because it is a flag that is know to be paired with raceism
Answer: the answer you are looking for is, answer option C I believe that slave owners did produce 90% of the Texas cotton on plantations during the 1850s and 1860s, option B and D are linked because the more land you had the more slaves you had.
Explanation: If you are wondering, I took the test on edge 2020.
Answer:
The neutrality of the congress generated polarization in the country. This polarization caused states where slavery was prohibited to criticize and devalue states where slavery was allowed, which retaliated against devaluation with further devaluation.
Explanation:
When Congress decided to stay neutral in relation to slavery in the country, Congressmen believed that this would generate peace in the country, as each state would have autonomy to decide whether it wanted to use slaves or not.
However, the result could not have been more different. Neutrality generated polarization and many conflicts between countries that allowed slaves and prohibited slaves. Countries that did not allow slavery criticized, devalued and tried to interfere with the autonomy of the states that allowed slavery. The slaves who allowed slavery did not tolerate this interference and retaliated as best they could, in addition to promoting a strong devaluation in relation to free countries.
