1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bija089 [108]
3 years ago
11

Explain the major differences between the North and the South that led to the Civil War.

History
2 answers:
ch4aika [34]3 years ago
7 0

One of these differences was in the area of economy. The economy of an area has to do with how people make a living and how they spend their money. In the North, the economy was based on industry. They built factories and manufactured products to sell to other countries and to the southern states. They did not do a lot of farming because the soil was rocky and the colder climate made for a shorter growing season. Most people in the North worked in factories or owned their own businesses. In the South, the economy was based on agriculture. The soil was fertile and good for farming. They grew crops like cotton, rice, and tobacco on small farms and large plantations. The many large farms and plantations required thousands of workers. Because of this great need, the farmers began to depend on slave labor instead of trying to hire people to work in their fields.Another difference between the North and South had to do with the new states forming in the western territories. The North wanted the new states to be “free states.” Most northerners thought that slavery was wrong and many northern states had outlawed slavery. The South, however, wanted the new states to be “slave states.” Cotton, rice, and tobacco were very hard on the southern soil. These plants soon took all of the nutrients out of the soil. Without these nutrients the soil would not grow good crops. Because of this, the Southern farmers wanted to move west into the new states and take their slaves with them.These differences in the areas of economy, slavery, and new states began to divide the northern and southern states. In 1854, the U.S. Congress passed the Kansas-Nebraska Act, which essentially opened all new territories to slavery by asserting the rule of popular sovereignty over congressional edict. Pro- and anti-slavery forces struggled violently in “Bleeding Kansas,” while opposition to the act in the North led to the formation of the Republican Party, a new political entity based on the principle of opposing slavery’s extension into the western territories. After the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Dred Scott case (1857) confirmed the legality of slavery in the territories, the abolitionist John Brown’s raid at Harper’s Ferry in 1859 convinced more and more southerners that their northern neighbors were bent on the destruction of the “peculiar institution” that sustained them. Abraham Lincoln’s election in November 1860 was the final straw, and within three months seven southern states–South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Texas–had seceded from the United States.

Harlamova29_29 [7]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The North wanted the new states to be “free states.” Most northerners thought that slavery was wrong and many northern states had outlawed slavery. The South, however, wanted the new states to be “slave states.” They didn't want to give up their way of life

You might be interested in
URGENT.
Vikentia [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

enacted-ordinance

7 0
3 years ago
Do you think the US and Cuba should return to regular international relations?
gavmur [86]
I don’t know what if you have any questions about that I have no problem you have a merry thanksgiving merry love happy merry merry happy happy birthday mommy merry Christmas merry
8 0
3 years ago
(US GOVERMENT GENERAL HISTORY)
Mrrafil [7]
A; is specifically guaranteed by the Constitution. hope this helps 
4 0
3 years ago
What encouraged the Aryan people to settle on the Indian subcontinent?
Kruka [31]

Answer:

B. Herding lands in central india

7 0
3 years ago
What was a result of commodore matthew perry's voyage to japan in 1853? Apex?
Len [333]

Matthew C. Perry was the Commodore of the U.S. Navy who compelled the opening of Japan to world trade in 1854, by forcing on the Japanese shogunate the treaty of Kanagawa. Because of his threats and show of force, Japan was pressured to allow trade with the United States through the establishment of a treaty called the Convention of Kanagawa.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the knights of labor achieve their goals?
    6·1 answer
  • The Nuremberg Laws identified a Jew as someone who
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements best expresses the right to privacy
    5·1 answer
  • The belief that the United States had a right to extend its territory across the country was known as:
    7·2 answers
  • What made Crusaders states, such as the Kingdom of Jerusalem, vulnerable?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did British Prime Minister Winston Churchill insist on fighting the Nazis instead of negotiating with them?
    11·2 answers
  • Can the legislative branch EVICT a judge?
    5·1 answer
  • In what ways did Emperor Wu contribute to the creation of Han Dynasty?
    5·1 answer
  • How did the allied forces liberate France from the Nazis
    15·2 answers
  • A thesis statement about the Glorious Revolution’s influence on the American and French Revolutions would connect which phrases?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!