Answer:
He was having dept around, going into shop buying luzery things and telling them to split the money which they couldn't.
Everybody had been trying to lend me money, but I had fought off the most of them on one pretext or another; so this indebtedness represented only £300 borrowed money, the other £300 represented my keep and my purchases. I believed my second year's salary would carry me through the rest of the month if I went on being cautious and economical, and I intended to look sharply out for that. My month ended, my employer back from his journey, I should be all right once more, for I should at once divide the two years' salary among my creditors by assignment, and get right down to my work.
had money to spend, and was living like the rich and the great. I judged that there was going to be a crash by and by, but I was in now and must swim across or drown. You see there was just that element of impending disaster to give a serious side, a sober side, yes, a tragic side, to a state of things which would otherwise have been purely ridiculous. In the night, in the dark, the tragedy part was always to the front, and always warning, always threatening; and so I moaned and tossed, and sleep was hard to find. But in the cheerful daylight the tragedy element faded out and disappeared, and I walked on air, and was happy to giddiness, to intoxication, you may
Explanation:
this short story wasn't as immediately popular as 'The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County,' and it didn't feature the same kind of flair for capturing regional life in the United States. Instead, he places an American abroad in a situation where money is both an object and a prize, and the characters must prove their worth beyond material possessions.
Answer:
I would think that is false but i honestly don't know
Answer:
Explanation:
Pertaining to the interrogate for question 1.
“The narrator’s purpose in the first stanza is to”:
(3) propose an attitude towards life.
- The remnant answer choices are not considered or disclosed as logical or absurd as the relation between those answer choices, as well as the details stated, do not share any reasonable or observable information.
Pertaining to the interrogate for question 2.
“The words “weights heavier” (line 21) imply that”:
*Line 21 within the poem anecdote is not present, hence I cannot answer that question.
*I hope this helps.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Simple predicate - "delivered packages and mail"</em>
<em>Simple subject - "Frank", "School".</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The sentence “Frank delivered packages and mail to the school every day”. This sentence contains both simple predicate and simple subject. The simple predicate here is ‘delivered packages and mail’. Simple subject here is ‘frank’ and ‘school’. This is because Frank and school is an example of simple noun and it forms the simple subject. The simple predicate here is delivered packages and mail because it does not gives the complete information of the entire scenario.
Answer:
We paid a fleeting visit to Paris.
Explanation:
there. fleeting also means really fast.
