1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksian1 [2.3K]
3 years ago
12

In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of

this division of options on law?
A. Debate will encourage new laws
B. New laws will pass easily
C. Debate will slow new laws
D. Rights cannot be restricted
PLEASE 20 points !!
History
2 answers:
tigry1 [53]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

Roman55 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. Debate will encourage new laws

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Between the years of 1789 and 1799 France experienced some drastic changes as a result of revolution. Some would argue that the
masha68 [24]
<span>The French Revolution of 1789, while based on the ever-growing popular Enlightenment ideals put forth by philosophers such as Descartes, Voltaire, and Diderot, ultimately failed because the change in regime created a severe power vacuum. This allowed radicals to seize power and sow chaos within France

Hope this helps!</span>
5 0
3 years ago
The 2012 debate over the antipiracy bills known as sopa and pipa demonstrates that
bezimeni [28]
<span>Answer:
        arising outside the United States, contained measures that could possibly infringe online freedom of speech, websites, and Internet communities. Protesters also argued that there were insufficient safeguards in place to protect sites based upon user-generated content.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
According to Aristotle, which element of tragedy is the most important?
Alex Ar [27]
According to Aristotle, plot is the most important element of tragedy.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Select all that apply. Three benefits of the plow are _____. greater possible yields the use of residue of the remaining crops a
Misha Larkins [42]
Three benefits of the plow are greater possible yields, the use of residue of the remaining crops as fertilizer and a reduced amount of weeds. The correct options among all the options that are given in the question are the first, second and the penultimate option. I hope that the answer has come to your great help.
5 0
3 years ago
Goldstein says that the war being waged against another superpower is not the real war. what is the real war?
Wewaii [24]
The revenue after the fact
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the name given to people who opposed the Vietnam conflict?
    13·1 answer
  • The Bill of Rights initially was intended to
    14·1 answer
  • Why was united states v. lopez (1995) important? a. the court found the line-item veto unconstitutional. b. the court gave a bro
    7·1 answer
  • Help !!!! 20 points!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Please hurry
    14·1 answer
  • How did Hamilton convince Congress to approve of his idea to assume state debt?
    5·1 answer
  • Choose all of the statements that describe Ellis Island.
    6·1 answer
  • In a well organized paragraph describe how social, and political downfalls led to the fall of rome.
    13·2 answers
  • Urgent!!! Which of the following was most crucial in bringing about US abandonment of neutrality during WWI?
    14·1 answer
  • HELP!! No links please qnq
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!