1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksian1 [2.3K]
3 years ago
12

In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of

this division of options on law?
A. Debate will encourage new laws
B. New laws will pass easily
C. Debate will slow new laws
D. Rights cannot be restricted
PLEASE 20 points !!
History
2 answers:
tigry1 [53]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

Roman55 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. Debate will encourage new laws

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What Amendment provides evidence that the American colonists resented being forced to quarter British soldiers in their homes an
Sliva [168]
<span> B) the Third Amendment </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Why were many american indians more inclined to side with the french during the seven years' war than they were with the british
3241004551 [841]

Many American Indians more inclined to side with the French during the seven years' war than they were with the British colonists because the French were more inclined to settle widely on native lands than the English or Spanish were.

The Seven Years' War was an international battle between France and Great Britain over dominance on the world stage. Prussia tried to expand its territory in Europe and consolidate its authority as Britain, France, and Spain engaged in combat both in Europe and abroad with land-based troops and naval forces.

French-allied tribes aimed to thwart British advance. The British, who were settling with their wives and families while French trappers were marrying Native women, had caused more trouble than the French, who had caused less.

The French posed less of a danger to the Native Americans than they did in general. Less French were establishing permanent colonies and annexing Native American territory in North America. The Native Americans were likewise given more respect by the French.

Compared to other European nations, the French enjoy a greater rapport with American Indians. There are various reasons for this, including the fact that they respect the locals and depend on their assistance to exist. The yearly trade was their major priority. They earned respect from the Indians since they didn't fight over their territory.

To learn more about seven years' war, refer

brainly.com/question/904638

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain the impact of this change in belief system on<br> American identity.
Liula [17]
Answer: Became more millenial and radical
4 0
3 years ago
Why did Great Britain seize American ships? A. They claimed the ships were carrying British goods. B. They wanted the American g
Stels [109]
D. <span>They claimed the ships were carrying French goods</span>
7 0
3 years ago
What are the rights of the accused
Dvinal [7]
Guilty til proven innocent
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Ñame two requirements Alabama has to meet to reenter the union
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone help me plzzz <br><br> What are the causes of the big explorations
    5·1 answer
  • n The Spirit of the Laws (1748), __________ argues that any government, if it is to protect the liberty of its citizens, needs _
    8·1 answer
  • What factors helped create the prosperity that many Americans enjoyed in the 1950s
    12·1 answer
  • How did the introduction of animals in the Colombian exchange affect many Native American cultures? Apex
    13·1 answer
  • What did the Germans pledge they would do to any Allied vessel sailing around Britain?
    10·2 answers
  • How did Roosevelt view the great depression
    8·1 answer
  • What change in social attitude did the flapper represent in 1920s america?
    6·1 answer
  • As newcomers to India, the Aryans exchanged culture with the people living there. Describe what the Aryans gave to Indian societ
    9·1 answer
  • Earths population continues to grow daily. Which of the following statements best illustrates a possible consequence of such rap
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!