1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksian1 [2.3K]
3 years ago
12

In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of

this division of options on law?
A. Debate will encourage new laws
B. New laws will pass easily
C. Debate will slow new laws
D. Rights cannot be restricted
PLEASE 20 points !!
History
2 answers:
tigry1 [53]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

Roman55 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. Debate will encourage new laws

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How is religious affiliation similar in North and South America?
svp [43]
<span>B. Citizens in both continents state that religion plays an important role in their lives.
</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP PLZZ !! How would we learn about the lives of ordinary men and women who moved to the colonies ??
shtirl [24]
Likely simple things like drawings,diary, or journal entries.
4 0
2 years ago
What were the major differences between the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans?
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

The Federalists believed that American foreign policy should favor British interests, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to strengthen ties with the French. The Democratic-Republicans supported the government that had taken over France after the revolution of 1789.

 Examples: Hamilton & Jefferson

Hamilton and the Federalists wanted a strong central government, run by well-educated property owners. Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans wanted most power to stay with the states and wanted the farmers and the 'common man' to run the nation.

6 0
2 years ago
Why did other countries pay tribute to the Qing Empire?
Svetlanka [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

Nations like England believed that by paying tribute they not only bought protection for themselves but also redirected the pirates to wreak havoc on the merchant ships of competing nations. The American colonies traded extensively in the Mediterranean before the Revolutionary War.

4 0
3 years ago
In his arguments in Brown v. Board of Education, the lawyer for Linda Brown claimed that “separate but equal” public schools wer
kkurt [141]
The Lawyer of Linda Brown claimed that those schools were racist and segregated students based on archaic and incorrect beliefs that there is genetic difference between white and black people in which the African-Americans are not as developed. Of course, the supreme court ruled that we are all equal and the schools were forced to put the students together.
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What political,economic,and social factors helped bring about the Reformation
    5·1 answer
  • Is the articles of confederation a reliable source?
    8·2 answers
  • The............officially ended ww1
    15·2 answers
  • What happened in the Soviet afghan war ? And how does it fit into the Cold War
    5·1 answer
  • Tokswsav ; my TikTok
    7·2 answers
  • 1) How did the French and Indian War lead to change in the colonies?<br><br> HELPP ASAP!
    12·1 answer
  • How did the government try to influence citizen’s views of paying income tax?
    10·1 answer
  • What is an era? What is an era?What is an era?What is an era?
    7·2 answers
  • 20 points<br><br> why do you think respect is important<br><br> own words pls
    8·2 answers
  • Read the excerpt from a history of the world in 100 objects. in the early nineteenth century japan had been effectively closed o
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!