1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oksian1 [2.3K]
3 years ago
12

In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of

this division of options on law?
A. Debate will encourage new laws
B. New laws will pass easily
C. Debate will slow new laws
D. Rights cannot be restricted
PLEASE 20 points !!
History
2 answers:
tigry1 [53]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

Roman55 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

A. Debate will encourage new laws

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Was imperialism (empire building) by the French, English, Spanish &
storchak [24]

Answer:Imperialism impacted societies in countless negative ways. It led to slave trade which then led to social discrimination around the world. It also damaged the cultures and created disunity among the natives. Last but not least, imperialism stripped countries off their natural resources and left nothing for the natives.

Explanation:

It helped develop global defense support.

With over 650 military bases in 38 different countries, American Imperialism has helped give the world some level of defensive support, protecting people around the world during conflict. This is by providing training, support, equipment and other resources

Portugal was never very big. Spain's decline began in the 17th century, mainly caused by them losing a struggle with France under Louis XIV. Both were weakened by sticking to a very narrow version of Roman Catholicism, and not valuing education.

8 0
2 years ago
The principle of separation of powers state
Leokris [45]

The principal of separation of powers expresses that the official, authoritative, and legal executive forces of government ought to be separated into various branches and not moved in one. These offices ought to be isolated and unmistakable as a result of the ruining idea of intensity.

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the ideas of the enlightment not have
strojnjashka [21]
In France, the central doctrines of the Enlightenment philosophers were individual liberty and religious tolerance, in opposition to an absolute monarchy and the fixed dogmas of the Church.

Hope this helps
6 0
2 years ago
Which Native American culture do these statements describe?
o-na [289]

Answer:

C)Mississippian

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What is the New General Catalogue?
topjm [15]

The New General Catalogue of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars (abbreviated as NGC) is a catalogue of deep-sky objects compiled by John Louis Emil Dreyer in 1888.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A main reason the Age of Revolutions failed to achieve widespread change in Europe was
    8·1 answer
  • What was the turning point in the american revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • By how much did southern representation in Congress increase between 1782 and 1790?
    15·1 answer
  • The right to petition members of the government is contained in the ___ amendment to the constitution
    12·2 answers
  • If you were to travel back in time to Ancient Rome what would be some places you should go visit ?
    10·1 answer
  • Choose all that apply. Imperialism needed two things to work. They were: trade people land money
    15·1 answer
  • What are some arguments for and against the child labor amendment ? Pls help I'll give brainliest
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a type of Movement
    8·1 answer
  • What is the term for a nationalist movement calling for the Jewish people to reestablish a Jewish country in their ancient homel
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a reason the Czar's autocratic policies toward the people led to social unrest?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!