Answer:
<h2>In October 1962, an American U-2 spy plane secretly photographed nuclear missile sites being built by </h2><h2>the Soviet Union on the island of </h2><h2>Cuba. President Kennedy did not </h2><h2>want the Soviet Union and Cuba to know that he had discovered the missiles. He met in secret with his advisors for several days to discuss</h2><h2> the problem.</h2>
Explanation:
<h2>______________________________</h2><h2>
<em><u>PLEASE</u></em><em><u> MARK</u></em><em><u> ME</u></em><em><u> BRAINLIEST</u></em><em><u> AND</u></em><em><u> FOLLOW</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>ME</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>LOTS</u></em><em><u> OF</u></em><em><u> LOVE</u></em><em><u> FROM</u></em><em><u> MY</u></em><em><u> HEART</u></em><em><u> AND</u></em><em><u> SOUL</u></em><em><u> DARLING</u></em><em><u> TEJASWINI</u></em><em><u> SINHA</u></em><em><u> HERE</u></em><em><u> ❤️</u></em></h2>
Answer:
Freedom of Information Act
Explanation:
The Federal legislation that would force the FDA to release the outcome of the study is the Freedom of Information Act of 1967 which grant citizens the right to total or partial information from government agencies. The activism group could sue the FDA to enforce that right of the citizens. The law also states agency information which are subject to disclosure and define exemptions to the disclose procedure.
C) ability to influence other to enhance their own objectives
Answer: C. the individuals who were relatively unprejudiced became even less prejudiced and the individuals who were relatively prejudiced became even more prejudiced.
Explanation: The scenario above could be explained using the risky or choice shift phenomenon which is a study which explains how decisions made by individuals when alone and when part of a group differs. The study shows that decisions made when individuals form part of a group often tends to be riskier than when such decision is made alone.
This is the reason why individuals who were relatively unprejudiced before the discussion became even less prejudiced after the discussion and the individuals who were relatively prejudiced before the discussion became even more prejudiced after the discussion.
This could be due to the fact that they want to be in line with other members or do not want to let them down. Or belief that shared risk decreases level of individual risk.