STEP 1
Describe the work and its creator in the first paragraph. Do not assume that readers know the work or author, so place the work in context. Ask yourself if the text is a first outing for the author or the latest in a long series. Does the author have a reputation or expertise in a certain field? Is the work controversial or well-known or little-known, and why? Describe the intended audience for the work.
STEP 2
Write an accurate summary of the work’s main ideas in the second paragraph. Do not mingle your evaluation with the summary. Merely explain the most important ideas the author tried to convey in the entire work.
STEP 3
Judge the author’s presentation in the third paragraph. Did the author present accurate and relevant data in a logical manner? Did the author clearly define important terms or jargon? Did the author offer sound interpretations? Focus, in this paragraph, on whether the author achieved his or her purpose for creating the work.
STEP 4
State both your agreement and disagreement with the author in the fourth paragraph. Develop your ideas by explaining why you agree and disagree with the author’s ideas. Cite other critics who support your interpretation.
STEP 5
Compose the conclusion, often the shortest paragraph in the critique. Restate the main agreements and objections to the work. In the closing, do not mention any new idea that does not appear.in the body paragraphs. The final paragraph gives an overview of the entire essay by restating its main ideas.
C because a verb is something to describe an action, state, or occurrence.
Ian wrote a list of his four favourite films for Joe. The list included Alien Predator, Terminator, and Rocky.
Joe read the list. "These are mostly sci-fi," he said. "I like musical films."
<em>Hope this helps!</em>
The following statements are the key ideas from the article about Barry Bonds:
<u>- No players were chosen for the Baseball Hall of Fame in 2013.</u>
- People disagree about whether baseball players accused of using
<u>performance-enhancing drugs should join the Hall of Fame.</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
The given article discusses about the drug allegation in Major League Baseball and the accusation against the athletes.
The players who are suspected for consumption of the drugs were not chosen for the Hall of Fame. The voters were not able to select the players suspected of doping. The disagreement by the people for the doping issue is supported by the author.
The article mentions that some of the drugs have medical uses. But this was not the key idea of the article. It is shown that the athletes have used the drugs without prescriptions which are illegal.
