The answer is C
(most Americans wanted a Democrat in Office.) !!
Explanation:
In simpler words, the multi-part question is asking for you to first analyze the three sources, then pick a side and have knowledge to defend your point on the question 'to what extent should nations pursue their national interests'.
In source 1, it shows that the majority of Canadians are opposed to sending troops to Afghanistan, with 36% voting for, 5% unsure, and 59% voting against.
Source two is clearly depicting the nazi's, at a rally held in Nuremberg. Although the source does not state if the protesters are pro or against Nazi regime, I am assuming they are pro. This would lead to the assumption that the people of Nuremberg are pro-Nazi empire.
The source 3 is a timeline, that goes from 1920 to 2005. This time period is very significant, because it captures many important battles, such as world war 2, Persian Gulf War, and the Iraq invasion.
After reading these three sources, you must decide if you think it is good for nations to pursue their national interests, or bad.
Hope this long explanation helped clarify the troubling question for you!
Answer: Hope This Helps Have A Nice Day/Night :)
Explanation:
Rationalism, in Western philosophy, the view that regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge. Holding that reality itself has an inherently logical structure, the rationalist asserts that a class of truths exists that the intellect can grasp directly.
~Kay~
Answer:
14.) they purposely created a weak gov. because of their fear of recreating the tyranny of England which they so desperately tries to get away from. they wanted to give barely any power to the central gov so they couldnt boss around *for a lack of better words* the states.
15.) Shays' is so important because of Shays' rebellion. Although James Madison knew the Articles needed to be completely rewrote, he couldnt voice his opinion since so many others didnt believe him or feared the truth. so when shays rebellion happened it kinda woke up the delegates and forced them to see what no taxing and no central gov was doing to the newly founded country. Daniel shays was the leader of the shays rebellion, a group of farmers and unpaid veterans who needed their money that they rightfully deserved from the war.
Explanation:
I learned this extensively in last year history and remember it almost to a tee
