You can't really justify anything but dramatic irony.
It isn't foreshadowing. She is genuinely weeping and it has nothing to do with future events
There is no allusion in this. Her crying is not symbolic. Nor does it refer back to anything
An oxymoron is a contradiction that seems false or unrelated but isn't. Her weeping is genuine. You might be able to make a case for this but dramatic irony is much better: Juliet's mother thinks one thing, the audience knows another.
Immigrants were encouraged by political machines: If you offer free rent food
Answer: no, since infatuate is a short admiration for someone not hatred
He was proclaiming the idea of united Italy.
Explanation:
- Cavour wanted to make effective use of the Republican National Liberation Movement, led by Garibaldi to bring the countries of central and southern Italy under the domination of the Savoy dynasty.
- The Italian rebirth is accomplished through political, diplomatic and military action by the Italian "state" of Piedmont, led by King Vittorio Emanuel and Minister Cavour.
- Support for impending unification was sought primarily in France. Cavour and Napoleon III met in 1859 in utmost secrecy and determined the terms of the military-political alliance. The provocative Austria declared war on Piedmont in 1859 and marched to its borders with a large army. To the astonishment of the entire European public, France was also at war in the Piedmont side.
Learn more on Cavour on
brainly.com/question/1596357
brainly.com/question/8702399
brainly.com/question/4318936
#learnwithBrainly
Hey there!
Under the Albany Plan of Union, the American colonies would have been ruled by a grand council and a president general. American colonies handled domestic matters, so, they surely didn't really have extreme full power. Which makes it understandable that they would have to have two leaders, to make sure that all 13 colonies are being handled correctly in which they should correspond.
Your answer: a grand council and a president general
