1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivann1987 [24]
3 years ago
8

In two to four paragraphs, explain what happened musically as Britten introduced the orchestral instruments. Include a discussio

n of:
the order in which the instruments introduced the theme, as heard in the first 2:00 minutes of the piece;
why the composer might have chosen to use different sections of the orchestra to play at different times; and
how this piece helps you gain a better understanding of the orchestra.
Music appreciation
History
2 answers:
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
7 0
You should have a goood dayyy today
Nastasia [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Britten used a variety of instruments from different families and changed the traditional order. He started with the woodwinds, then strings, then brass, and percussion. He started with the highest pitched instruments in each of the families. This made the differences in the timbers of different sections of the orchestra more clear.  

The composer might have chosen to use different sections of the orchestra to play at different times to convey different sounds or emotions. Playing at different times does this by putting the spotlight on a specific group of instruments this helps build variety and expense through the peice of music

This piece helps me gain a better understanding of the orchestra by letting me hear the different parts and get a better all around understanding of what they were about this helps quite a bit long term as we are then able to identify when this or a similar orchestra are playing in the future

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Who assisted James Monroe in the writing of the Monroe doctrine?
netineya [11]

Two things had been uppermost in the minds of Adams and Monroe. In 1821 the Russian czar had proclaimed that all the area north of the fifty-first parallel and extending one hundred miles into the Pacific would be off-limits to non-Russians. Adams had refused to accept this claim, and he told the Russian minister that the United States would defend the principle that the ‘American continents are no longer subjects of any new European colonial establishments.’

More worrisome, however, was the situation in Central and South America. Revolutions against Spanish rule had been under way for some time, but it seemed possible that Spain and France might seek to reassert European rule in those regions. The British, meanwhile, were interested in ensuring the demise of Spanish colonialism, with all the trade restrictions that Spanish rule involved. British foreign secretary George Canning formally proposed, therefore, that London and Washington unite on a joint warning against intervention in Latin America. When the Monroe cabinet debated the idea, Adams opposed it, arguing that British interests dictated such a policy in any event, and that Canning’s proposal also called upon the two powers to renounce any intention of annexing such areas as Cuba and Texas. Why should the United States, he asked, appear as a cockboat trailing in the wake of a British man-of-war?

In the decades following Monroe’s announcement, American policymakers did not invoke the doctrine against European powers despite their occasional military ‘interventions’ in Latin America. Monroe’s principal concern had been to make sure that European mercantilism not be reimposed on an area of increasing importance economically and ideologically to the United States. When, however, President John Tyler used the doctrine in 1842 to justify seizing Texas, a Venezuelan newspaper responded with what would become an increasingly bitter theme throughout Latin America: ‘Beware, brothers, the wolf approaches the lambs.’

Secretary of State William H. Seward attempted a bizarre use of the doctrine in 1861 in hopes of avoiding the Civil War. The United States, said Seward, in order to divert attention from the impending crisis, should challenge supposed European interventions in the Western Hemisphere by launching a drive to liberate Cuba and end the last vestiges of colonialism in the Americas. President Lincoln turned down the idea.

In the 1890s, the United States, once again by unilateral action, extended the doctrine to include the right to decide how a dispute between Venezuela and Great Britain over the boundaries of British Guiana should be settled. Secretary of State Richard Olney told the British, ‘Today the United States is practically sovereign on this continent and its fiat is law upon the subjects to which it confines its interposition…. its infinite resources combined with its isolated position render it master of the situation and practically invulnerable as against any or all other powers.’ The British, troubled by the rise of Germany and Japan, could only acquiesce in American pretensions. But Latin American nations protested the way in which Washington had chosen to ‘defend’ Venezuelan interests.

4 0
3 years ago
Compare the methods the Portuguese and the Dutch used to control the spice trade in Asia.
kvasek [131]

Answer:

The comparison between Portuguese and Dutch trade in Asia is done below

Explanation:

Dutch

  • Monopoly of spice trade
  • possessed  trading post empires
  • Later practiced colonial form of domination instead of trading post empires
  • Attention geared towards Indonesia
  • Attempt to control the shipping business

Portuguese

  • Unrest in trade due to less value placed on European trade goods
  • Raiding of ships and getting away it in order to circumvent monopolistic behaviors
  • The Muslims who were monopolistic in spice trade thru setting up of post empires and seizing it force.
6 0
3 years ago
How were non museum people treated when they were conquered by the Islamic empire
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

Non-Muslims did not always enjoy the same legal and social privileges as Muslims, though. Sometimes they had restrictions on their dress, public religious display, professions, and places of worship. They also paid higher taxes and tariffs. Additionally, non-Muslim men could not marry Muslim women.

3 0
3 years ago
What does Hammurabi's code teach us about social hierarchy? What does that teach us about the purpose of early law codes?
nikklg [1K]

Answer:

the 282 laws are one of the earliest and more complete written legal codes from ancient times. The codes have served as a model for establishing justice in other cultures and are believed to have influenced laws established by Hebrew scribes, including those in the Book of Exodus.

Explanation:

Hammurabi's Code is one of the most helpful windows that we have into examining Babylonian society. One thing we learn is that reputation was incredibly important as the Code specifically lays out punishments for slander (Law #127). ... The Code illustrates that property and ownership were extremely important.

8 0
3 years ago
Which ancient civilization was ruled by many dynasties, including the Song and Ming, and eventually developed the idea of the dy
castortr0y [4]
Dynastic cycle (traditional Chinese: 朝代循環; simplified Chinese: 朝代循环; pinyin: Cháodài Xúnhuán) is an important political theory in the Chinese history. According to this theory, each dynasty in Chinese history, rises to a political, cultural, and economic peak and then, because of moral corruption, declines, loses the Mandate of Heaven, and falls, only to be replaced by a new dynasty. The cycle then repeats under a surface pattern of repetitive motifs.[1]

It sees a continuity in Chinese history from early times to the present by looking at the succession of empires or dynasties, implying that there is little basic development or change in social or economic structures.[2] John K. Fairbank expressed the doubts of many historians when he wrote that "the concept of the dynastic cycle... has been a major block to the understanding of the fundamental dynamics of Chinese history."[3]
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to wilk and cliggett, the development of neoclassical economic theory was a key turning point in the history of econom
    12·1 answer
  • Why is the Declaration of Independence considered a revolutionary document?
    8·2 answers
  • What event led to racial tensions during the summer of 1919?
    15·1 answer
  • Write a thesis statement for your argument. My topic is about online learning(School)
    10·2 answers
  • NEED HELP NOW
    12·1 answer
  • How did knew tecnology help farmers in the greay plains.
    12·1 answer
  • It has been suggested that Senators actually appoint federal district judges, and Presidents
    7·1 answer
  • One way which the centralization of states impacted the role of religion during the period 1450-1750
    9·1 answer
  • What were some important features of Shang society?
    6·1 answer
  • How did Imperialism change Japan?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!