1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivann1987 [24]
3 years ago
8

In two to four paragraphs, explain what happened musically as Britten introduced the orchestral instruments. Include a discussio

n of:
the order in which the instruments introduced the theme, as heard in the first 2:00 minutes of the piece;
why the composer might have chosen to use different sections of the orchestra to play at different times; and
how this piece helps you gain a better understanding of the orchestra.
Music appreciation
History
2 answers:
luda_lava [24]3 years ago
7 0
You should have a goood dayyy today
Nastasia [14]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Britten used a variety of instruments from different families and changed the traditional order. He started with the woodwinds, then strings, then brass, and percussion. He started with the highest pitched instruments in each of the families. This made the differences in the timbers of different sections of the orchestra more clear.  

The composer might have chosen to use different sections of the orchestra to play at different times to convey different sounds or emotions. Playing at different times does this by putting the spotlight on a specific group of instruments this helps build variety and expense through the peice of music

This piece helps me gain a better understanding of the orchestra by letting me hear the different parts and get a better all around understanding of what they were about this helps quite a bit long term as we are then able to identify when this or a similar orchestra are playing in the future

Explanation:

You might be interested in
1. Compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson toward American Indians.
sleet_krkn [62]

Answer and Explanation:

Bradstreet has an aggressive and negative view of the North American indigenous people, he believes that they are savage, violent, uncivilized and that they must be fought in the name of the goals of the English. He believes that the Indians are oppressive and that this should not be tolerated. He believes that the Indians will unite against England and for that reason it is necessary to be prepared. Probably, this view that Bradstreet has towards indigenous people comes from bad experiences he had with the tribes, as well as an imperialist thought full of prejudices and a strong racism and intolerance.

Johnson, on the other hand, although he believes that indigenous people are uncivilized, he believes that working for them will be more profitable for the English, than fighting them. He believes that indigenous people are a fascinating people and that they have dominion over the lands that the English are taking over. Even in the midst of this, the Indians are willing to divide the land and for this they make small demands that can easily be met by the English, establishing harmony with all peoples. Johnson's view comes from the humanistic character and the peaceful nature that he possessed.

3 0
3 years ago
11.The Erie Canal and the
jok3333 [9.3K]

Answer:

i think it is D) moving people easier and cheape

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help with this political cartoon I’ll give 20 points and brainliest.
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

Its reform is one aspect of wider UN reform being considered by a high level panel formed by the Secretary General Kofi Annan last year.

Explanation:

Its reform is one aspect of wider UN reform being considered by a high level panel formed by the Secretary General Kofi Annan last year.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the most popular Indian instrument? <br> Drums<br> None of the above<br> Guitar<br> Sitar
Sphinxa [80]
The most popular Indian instrument is Sitar
8 0
3 years ago
Did the federal government respond to the Great Recession of 2007-2009 with the right policy tools? Why or why not?
Oxana [17]

Yes, the federal government responded to the great recession of 2007-09.

<u>Explanation: </u>

The United States endured the most serious post-war depression between December 2007 and June 2009.

The economic crisis of 2007-09 was long enough to call itself the "Great Recession" and accompanied by a lengthy and exceptionally slow recovery. The financial crisis was deep and severe enough.

The subsequent recessions have been followed by two types of policy mechanisms: monetary and fiscal.  

Monetary policy is used to preserve low-interest rates and reduce unemployment both during and after depression, which is the Act regarding the Federal Reserve .

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • #1: Why did the Tokugawa shogunate keep Japan isolated from 1603 until 1853?
    7·2 answers
  • Select all that apply.
    15·1 answer
  • What were inca cities like?
    15·1 answer
  • Ho Chi Minh and Jomo Kenyatta were leaders of movements that were attempting to achieve (1) nuclear disarmament (3) pan-Africani
    15·1 answer
  • The balance of power in central and eastern europe was reshaped at the end of the seventeenth and beginning of the eighteenth ce
    7·1 answer
  • In the 1800s, an important push factor for “new” immigrants was
    12·1 answer
  • What was the primary cause of the French and Indian War? A. American colonists declared their independence from France and were
    5·1 answer
  • How did the election of 1796 increase political tension
    14·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of Communism? Did it work?
    8·1 answer
  • How have empires become powerful?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!