<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be the one having to do with the economic and cultural rivalry that existed between Great Britain and Russia for dominance of the Middle East and parts of Asia, since they were trying to obtain influence and natural resources. </span></span>
I think is D
Explanation:
bc the Pres. has the power to veto or sign and I think he can also ask to make changes
Answer:uierihu4ihvk45y4yqebqxynrgywgruxwejhcwbroyujhbfnceiuhgjmeiurtnuytnivntihbe6oiyn voui6hyoem6eo 8hmyufhtjoiwmi9rtih58yhimh89hy irty fiy
Explanation:
Answer:
If/when chosen by the people you get a more appealing outcome.
Because... The determining factors are YOUR family, friends, and town-folk. It's the people you grew up with. So you all are aware of the same problems in your city/state and you are more than likely both thinking of the same solution. Where as, if chosen by a legislature, you have a bunch of well paid senators who may not see all the things normal people do since they work and live indoors and nowhere near the problems most of the time. They don't care for the middle to lower classes. Most just care about the rich and how to make themselves better and wealthier. It sucks to see, and even more to be living in this kind of world but it's just how it is.
