prehistoric artists wrote down their thoughts, feelings, and artistic process for later generations of artists and others to read. This statement is false.
Prehistoric, also called pre-literate history,[1] is the period of human history up to the use of the first stone tools by hominins. 3.3 million years ago, the beginning of recorded history with the invention of the writing system. Although the use of symbols, signs, and images appeared in humans very early, the oldest known writing system appeared c. 5000 years ago.
It took thousands of years for Prehistoric to become widespread, and by the 19th century, writing had spread to almost every culture. As such, the end of prehistory occurred at very different times in different places, making the term less common when referring to societies whose prehistory ended relatively recently.
Learn more about prehistoric here
brainly.com/question/538395
#SPJ4
Answer:
Ancient Egyptian
Explanation:
Rosetta Stone is a block of black granite (often misidentified as "basalt"), measuring 118 cm high, 77 cm wide and 30 thick.
The stone block has strange minted glyphs separated into three distinct parts. Each part presents a kind of writing that was nothing like the other two. These three forms of writing, it turned out, were texts in the languages written in ancient Egyptian, Demotic, and Greek.
Critics - cues are internal
Historians - cues are external (have to know additional info)
or
Historians studies time gone by while artists makes remarks about art
Answer:
So that the leader can use them to the situation's advantage.
Explanation:
If you have a project to create an advertisement for a band on a poster with 3 people with different talents and abilities you can assign who does what or mediate what gets done by who as the leader.
So say Sarah is good with color coordination and designing typographies or letters, so she can collaborate with Z who is amazing at drawing or photoshopping the actual pictures to get a coordinated color that is pleasing. Then Z is not only great at drawing but can take photos, so now Sarah can help Z get an idea about what colors to use in the band's photoshoot or with lighting. Then you have Rodney who may not be as creative as Sarah and Z, but Rodney knows a ton about what type of paper to use and how to print out colors to get the best effect. And maybe he's good at getting deals on ink and paper too, so now they don't have to worry about the logistics side for their project because Rodney has it under control.
But say you as a leader assigned that and didn't know these things and maybe your group is finding trouble assigning roles and so now the poster looks terrible.
But if you did, and you did find those things out, you could find a way to mediate the poster to look its best.
if thats confusing - you could compare it to baking a cake and having X Y Z where X is good at flavor mixing, Y is good at baking the actual cake, Z is good at decorating. As a leader you would want X Y Z to do the thing that they're best at, but if you don't know what they're good at you can't use it as an advantage to create the best outcome.
